brilliant car mate
insurance group 15.
i tend to get about 320 miles to a tank
Better quality build on a 197, bout the one and only reason I can see to get one over a decent 1*2.
But I suppose we will see on the quality when the 197's start to hit the warranty honeymoon??????
If you had a 197 for a week or so you find more than that to prefer over a 1*2
Better quality build on a 197, bout the one and only reason I can see to get one over a decent 1*2.
But I suppose we will see on the quality when the 197's start to hit the warranty honeymoon??????
A shed thats better to drive, and quicker. For some people, the cup holder mentality doesn't matter. Its a hot hatch, all the best have one thing in common, lack of weight. You can't beat physics. Its why on matter how much i love the trophy, i accept a 205 is lighter on its feet, more responsive, more fun. Am i going to bleat on about the 182 having a better cabin? f**k no. Sadly, reliability is a must for my work, otherwise i'd have a 205.
I've driven several, had in total for 2 days. I agree with the performance car article (which came from a guy that had run a 197 for over 6 months, track days etc etc). Trophy is the better drive at 7/10 than a 197 at 10/10.Fair play, but TBH they're only minutely slower in real terms. Probably the difference between a 182 & 182Cup, ergo nothing to speak of. I'm not sure how the 182 is 'better to drive' though. It's far less comfy inside, has a horrid driving position, rougher. The 197 definitely has more grip, and is definitely more stable at all speeds. Handling can be subjective, but IMO it also outhandles the 182 by quite some margain. The grip and stabilty inspire extreme confidence, and it can be steered on the throttle near the limit just like the 182.
Horses for course and all that. Everyone wants different things, but unless you'rer stuck in a time warp, or have never driven one, I think it's almost impossible to conclude that a 182 is nicer to drive, or that the 197 hasn't improved upon it tenfold. 182 has better steering feedback for sure, if you can manage holding onto the melting, massively oversized wheel, that is
i only thought on upgrading due to keeping with the times and liquid yellow 182s starting to all have high milage which = bad/poor reliability etc... i have a 172 anyway, not a 182, so the performance will prob the same if not better than the 172 i currently own now... so its all an improvement
and no, i dont want any other colour apart from liquid yellow! tis the best colour in the hole wide world! :rasp::approve::star:
Nope. Merely the better hot hatch IMO. As I said, he should drive them. Different people want different things, but as soon as these topics come up, there's always a 197 owner who has to come on and start slating the 1*2's. Not sure why. 2-3 years ago, they were all singing the praises of the 1*2's. Suppose some people have to justify whatever car they own.lol okay the 182 is a better car. Case closed.
Laptime wars. Brilliant.
Nope. Merely the better hot hatch IMO. As I said, he should drive them. Different people want different things, but as soon as these topics come up, there's always a 197 owner who has to come on and start slating the 1*2's. Not sure why. 2-3 years ago, they were all singing the praises of the 1*2's. Suppose some people have to justify whatever car they own.
Merely using the lap time to show some of what you're saying can't be true. Barely slower, more grippy, much more stable, yet slower lap times? Doesn't really make sense does it fella?lol okay the 182 is a better car. Case closed.
Laptime wars. Brilliant.
Nope. Merely the better hot hatch IMO. As I said, he should drive them. Different people want different things, but as soon as these topics come up, there's always a 197 owner who has to come on and start slating the 1*2's. Not sure why. 2-3 years ago, they were all singing the praises of the 1*2's. Suppose some people have to justify whatever car they own.
Merely using the lap time to show some of what you're saying can't be true. Barely slower, more grippy, much more stable, yet slower lap times? Doesn't really make sense does it fella?
As I said, laptime wars. They mean nothing to me personally. If I wanted a racing car I'd buy a racing car. A hot hatch is about practical performance and the overall package. In that regard it wins over any 182.
I'm fairly sure the OP isn't going to use it soley on a track, so with that in mind he might be interested to know that as a road car, the 197 is much better than the 182. If you disagree then fine
EDIT: I think what you're suggesting is that my opinion that the 197 handles better than a 172/182 is wrong because a Trophy was quicker around some track?
Surely a 197 will be better?? Progression and all that......
I love my 182. Compared to my last car (Golf mk4), its raw and fun to drive. I haven't driven a 197 but I'd imagine its more refined and, dare I say, more grown up then the 182/ 172?
I don't have a Trophy. I have the worst, nastiest, shoddiest ph1 172 in the known world. Shite. But I love it![/font]
Indeed!!! Trophy this Trophy that
No. As said, handling is very subjective, what I like others won't. But you've said the 197 is grippier, far more stable, and not even mentioned the brakes (which are awesome on the 197). Then said it's barely (if at all) slower. My point is, if a car is far grippier, more stable, and as quick in a straight line (with far better brakes) then it should be a chunk quicker on a track, no?EDIT: I think what you're suggesting is that my opinion that the 197 handles better than a 172/182 is wrong because a Trophy was quicker around some track?
I don't have a Trophy. I have the worst, nastiest, shoddiest ph1 172 in the known world. s**te. But I love it!
No. As said, handling is very subjective, what I like others won't. But you've said the 197 is grippier, far more stable, and not even mentioned the brakes (which are awesome on the 197). Then said it's barely (if at all) slower. My point is, if a car is far grippier, more stable, and as quick in a straight line (with far better brakes) then it should be a chunk quicker on a track, no?