DC2 TypeR / E36 328i
I might just end up with my 106 on the road if I dont find something suitable anyway, that wont be a bad thing
My rule of thumb would be the CAP system, I don't know if you are familiar with it? It's like glasses guide but electronic, and it monitors what vehicles sell for at auctions and retail on forcourts. It then averages the prices to give three tiers of vehicle quality. You input the mileage and select the model and year of the vehicle and it gives you the three trade in prices and a retail figure.
I work as a Sales exec for Mazda, and most dealers have a vehicle price monitoring system for valuing PX's. A "clean" 2001 Clio Sport with 80,000 miles had a trade in value of £630 and a retail value of £1095 at the time that I purchased my car.
The used car market it controlled by the buyers demand, if everybody was only willing to pay a grand for a certain car, the market would drop until the demanding price was met. Simple economics, we dictate our own car prices in a strange way.
Have a look on Pistonheads at the moment - http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/li...t=&px=&xsl=list&pagesize=15&filter=TP&o=q&pc=
I'd say I paid spot on the money for my car, similar cars but two years newer are only £4/500 dearer.
You can have my Clio for £3k as it is. No joke.
Belts need doing next year though.
Knowing you, you wont have it that long anyway.
You paid less than £3k didn't you? I read your thread :|
I'd be round with the cash now if it was RB.
Potential argument starter here, but I'm going to say it anyway.
Other than the obvious power improvements, what's so great about 182's?
I paid less than £900 for my immaculate, one owner from new, FSH 172 which was on 78K and had JUST had the belts done by a main dealer. With the change between my 172 and a 182 I could easily TB or RS2 or cam it. My 172 after a fastchip map is quicker than a 182 and has more torque, still for less than a grand.
I just don't see the attraction myself, why pay more than you have to for something? Unless I am missing something glaringly obvious?
My rule of thumb would be the CAP system, I don't know if you are familiar with it? It's like glasses guide but electronic, and it monitors what vehicles sell for at auctions and retail on forcourts. It then averages the prices to give three tiers of vehicle quality. You input the mileage and select the model and year of the vehicle and it gives you the three trade in prices and a retail figure.
I work as a Sales exec for Mazda, and most dealers have a vehicle price monitoring system for valuing PX's. A "clean" 2001 Clio Sport with 80,000 miles had a trade in value of £630 and a retail value of £1095 at the time that I purchased my car.
The used car market it controlled by the buyers demand, if everybody was only willing to pay a grand for a certain car, the market would drop until the demanding price was met. Simple economics, we dictate our own car prices in a strange way.
Have a look on Pistonheads at the moment - http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/li...t=&px=&xsl=list&pagesize=15&filter=TP&o=q&pc=
I'd say I paid spot on the money for my car, similar cars but two years newer are only £4/500 dearer.
Wouldnt go near a cup tbhWith 3k to spend, I'd get a mint 172 cup with low miles and belts done etc... A good 182 for this money will generally be higher mileage which may or may not put you off.
With 3k to spend, I'd get a mint 172 cup with low miles and belts done etc... A good 182 for this money will generally be higher mileage which may or may not put you off.
I disagree. My mate is selling his 182 at the moment, pretty low mileage and just had the belts and dephaser done and he would probably take £2700 for it.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2004-RENA...mobiles_UK&hash=item19d364f683#ht_1729wt_1039
The photo's or ad aren't the best and its got apex springs but he's recently had a dent man on it so the bodywork is pretty good.
Ha, that's my mates Fezza in the background
Does he work at furrows or something?
Wouldnt go near a cup tbh