frayz
ClioSport Club Member
Where’s my caster?
Okay, so I’m wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this. Basically my car has a lot less caster than I expect it should have. I’m lead to believe they should run around 3.10 degrees of static caster from the factory, of which I’ve seen plenty of cars running.
My car currently
- Clio 2005 FF with both cup packs.
- Correct Cup lower arms
- Powerflex black lower arm bushes
- Roll centre correction hubs
- AST 5100 dampers.
- PMS topmounts.
Upon having the geo done you can see I’m sitting around 2.3 area which is pretty low to my mind.
When I fitted the arms I even pushed (for what it’s worth) the uniball carriers as far forward as possible before tightening.
Puzzled by this is started to look back through the cars history, and found the caster angle has always been lower than expected, so clearly nothing I’ve done since has altered this.
As said, I’ve seen standard cars with more caster than this. If we are splitting hairs, in theory I’ve got a slightly lower rake angle (front to rear) over the whole car so should have marginally increased the caster that way anyway.
You can see from the images below the offset drilling’s in the arms indicating these are indeed genuine Cup arms. The Powerflex bushes are up against the machined stop indicating the arms are in their correct location. I don’t wish to run the AST topmounts as I prefer the design of the PMS variants with the associated brace and have seen the turrets fail with the ASTs.
So failing to re-drill my lower arms to offset the lower uniball carrier even further.
Any suggestions welcome as to why I’m seeing such a low caster angle?
Anyone seen this before or have any ideas?
Thanks. 🙂👍🏼
This is my current geometry.
This was back when the car was stock.
Okay, so I’m wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this. Basically my car has a lot less caster than I expect it should have. I’m lead to believe they should run around 3.10 degrees of static caster from the factory, of which I’ve seen plenty of cars running.
My car currently
- Clio 2005 FF with both cup packs.
- Correct Cup lower arms
- Powerflex black lower arm bushes
- Roll centre correction hubs
- AST 5100 dampers.
- PMS topmounts.
Upon having the geo done you can see I’m sitting around 2.3 area which is pretty low to my mind.
When I fitted the arms I even pushed (for what it’s worth) the uniball carriers as far forward as possible before tightening.
Puzzled by this is started to look back through the cars history, and found the caster angle has always been lower than expected, so clearly nothing I’ve done since has altered this.
As said, I’ve seen standard cars with more caster than this. If we are splitting hairs, in theory I’ve got a slightly lower rake angle (front to rear) over the whole car so should have marginally increased the caster that way anyway.
You can see from the images below the offset drilling’s in the arms indicating these are indeed genuine Cup arms. The Powerflex bushes are up against the machined stop indicating the arms are in their correct location. I don’t wish to run the AST topmounts as I prefer the design of the PMS variants with the associated brace and have seen the turrets fail with the ASTs.
So failing to re-drill my lower arms to offset the lower uniball carrier even further.
Any suggestions welcome as to why I’m seeing such a low caster angle?
Anyone seen this before or have any ideas?
Thanks. 🙂👍🏼
This is my current geometry.
This was back when the car was stock.