Well for a start a turbod 182bhp 2litre car will not be terribly good engine if thats what its extracting unless its only running 1PSi or so.
NA cars have a better power band feed than turbo cars. When you have mapped a few you will also agree.
Bottom line is response and delivery are better than they would be on a tubo car.
Turbo engines and NA engines are entirely different, squish bands and static CR are higher in NA cars than turbo cars thus crisper response.
If any of you have ever used an accelerative dyno you will note the difference in power delivery. Turbo cars have the peak power but its not there from the off, its like fitting a decent bottom end to an NA, one run shows 50bhp to peak power which is the same but then you fit a decent crank, fly, rods etc and it will show 75bhp, thats an increase of 25 accelerative bhp.
Peak torque and bhp figures are higher and a rr printout will show more power through the rev range on the turbo, but you dont drive like you do on a RR.
Rolling roads are not there just whizz a car up to peak power in an instant wliek the cars can do on the road, you need to make sure its ok, this means proloning it to get the heat into the chambers then adjust fueling etc
I personannly hate doing it, spending hours tweaking things does my box in, I haven;t done it in a few years, I just make the engines.
But I forgot this is cliosport where 1.2 owners know better than us engine builders.
