Clio
Why do you have to buy one type for front and another for back*?
<*ffs>
<*ffs>
front brakes do 60-70% of the braking
If the rears were more efficient you'd spin the car.
if the rears performed as the fronts do, you'd end up with locked rears.
this is fairly simple to visualise if you imagine a car braking: the tyres are the only point of contact with the road and, due to the action of the springs in the suspension, the body mass shifts forward under braking. the majority of the braking force is required at the front of the car, as that's where all the weight is. the rear end is very light under braking and *needs* to be weaker.
think about it, if u ppull the handbrake up, that only on the rear, te back locks up, and if your conering you spin out. plus when you brake, weight transfers to the front....front brakes do 60-70% of the braking
Thanks. That's really helpful info.
At the risk of further boring other readers, can anyone explain why the front brakes are more efficient at braking, out of interest?
Would the front brakes still be more efficient due to mechanics / physics, even if all wheels had the same hardware, or is it because cheaper components are traditionally used for the rear in the first place?
|Damn. Reminds me of when I applied the front brakes too quickly on my BMX when I was 7. Flew over the top going downhill - still have cracks on my front teeth where tghe previous milk teeth landed on the tarmak and pushed up into my developing ones. : (