ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

Williams vs VTS =



  Remapped derv Golf


"With a mere 90 bhp horsepower progress is too leasurely to be called fast!" - Im Alan Partrigde Series 1
 
  172 Exclusive


The williams is faster than a VTS the reason why there is only a 0.1s difference in the 0-60 figures between the two is that to get to 60 in a williams you have to change into 3rd you dont have to do this in a VTS it will do over 60 in 2nd.

My mate has a VTS fully stripped out IK manifold de cat exhaust chip heads cams quaife close ratio gerabox. I have a valver with williams engine IK manifold de cat exhaust chip and lightened and balanced flywheel.

I beat this saxo and i have all my interior in and spare wheel.

The williams are quicker end of story
 
  Vee dub


"The Williams are quicker end of story"



Ok cheers! thats the end of that one! ;)

Yeah i think your right.
 
  ex Clio 172 owner :(


Quote: Originally posted by Adamf on 08 June 2004

"With a mere 90 bhp horsepower progress is too leasurely to be called fast!" - Im Alan Partrigde Series 1
"not my words - the words of Top Gear magazine...... hello?!"
 


Top