Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
It may well have been the best hot hatch in 1993, but where many people get carried away is to call it the best hot hatch EVER. That is a sweeping statement of manic proportions.
It is way down on power and torque compared to lots of modern hot hatches, including some that I have owned, for...
Nobody is talking out of their arse.
Well, at least, not until you accused me of same that is.......you are in that respect.......
Hold on to the past by all means, but the V6 is way better than a Mark 1 Williams in every measurable way. I left one for dead recently.
If that car is...
Yeah, but compared to a MK2 Clio V6, the Mk1 Williams is way down on performance and looks and class.
The V6 is unique. Nothing quite like it.
Loads of modern 4-pot hatchbacks can do what a Williams does.
I recently asked a question about the performance capabilities of the Clio V6 (2004 model), the thread of which which has been removed for some unknown reason.
(In case someone in authority here is very over-sensitive, (I would remind them though, that cars like the 182 and V6 are made to be...
Did the Williams not improve, as it got older then? Did the MK3 not move the model forward?
I have never driven a Williams, admittedly.
I only ask because most of the cars I have had improved with age. (Lancer Evolution 8 over 5, Vectra over Cavalier, new Mini over old, etc.)
I saw a feature in a car magazine at the dental surgery today, which was quite interesting.
It was from a year or more back and the article was discussing which Clio the writers would have, from all the various sporty ones produced over the years.
Leaving cost, resale value, etc., to one...