Search results

where did my post go? :S how much did the system gain, i've forgotten.

mike.......get your damn ass over here now! i want a looksee!

i'm no basketball player.........well maybe point gaurd lol. But the bench was built high so i dont have to hunch when porting, thats the dust extracted dirty room so its a bit rough in there.

spoke to the manufacturers last week, waiting upon confirmation date.

offiside 182 is braced to the block in a bearing housing.

formula renault run a diff plenum again. cliocup run a boggo standard engine, but they are sealed.....nothing blueprinted about them.

i like plain tailpipes.

depends what afr and load you are at. crusing should be lambda 1 or 14.7AFR for petrol. put it before the cat not after.

stroke it, stroke it and stroke it some more. dont take material off the block or you'll end up with a teeny quench depth and start smacking the piston into the head. head can be skimmed alot, depends how good you are at controlling cam timing.

Could almost say that, in all honestly i said he would be bearing the brunt of what is 'development' cost, so i said if he makes a sale of the same item i'll give him comssion so he can make some back. Only fair i thought.

you can increase the CR for next to free by skimming the head 40 thou (1mm), netting 12.36:1 CR. Not always the 'ideal' thing but certainly cheaper than stripping a whole block and rehoning, running in, cost of parts and labour just for a nominal bump in compression.

yes, but you will have to remap again if you havent done so to suit the compression increase already.

nope.........the asians LOOOOOVE to bore throttle bodies.

played it......it sucks. physics are rank.

it'll affect the torque spread. Peak torque will be moved up a few hundred rpm, but spread figures will still be slightly higher than stock. Problem is the space, which is why renault curled the manifold around the engine to get some length in, but if you want a straight runner you dont have...

Re: RR results for 1*2s ok not real stabbings.........but forum wars go on and on and on....they wont even accept RR info from the UK as we dont use their stupid inertia RR's.

Re: RR results for 1*2s you should see what its like in the states.....their arguements on which brand RR to use and having to have SAE correction and smoothing levels etc lead to stabbings.

Re: RR results for 1*2s i'll go hire a cupracer..........i just want to see your ass and it'll be an an easier and less homo way than asking.

IMO, what most people are forgetting to note is that there is a power ceiling. you cant just keep pushing power on what is a horrible inlet manifold. On stock cams your going to hit a wall at circa 190-ish simply because you have a capped timeframe for air to enter the cylinders, you can...

I recieved a missed delivery notice from royal mail, 5 mins before i got in the workshop, that yours?

some of us are just leaving work.

and even cheaper if you buy the sealy items.

nothing quite like post modern rational thought.

the rear..........i,e the almost identicle profile, diffuser, lights, bumper. i'm talking from a design point, its a copy.

cool, speak later this eve, i've got work to do.

how is the wheel bhp gain so teeny and different from the calculated fly outputs?

you'd be hard pressed to tell the diff between a clio and a corsa from the back.......almost a photocopy.

have you felt how tonka truck a vauxhall is!?

jesus, i think we need a highlands tuning forum!

:s