Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Yeah, some cars "feel" quicker than they are like my R5 Turbo and 106 GTi did, both were quick cars, but felt really quick!
Clios do feel quick though, my Cup did anyway...
I drove one of the first ones in the UK... was ok, but only a couple of days old & b*gger all miles on the clock, so still very tight and couldnt get a true impression. Was quick though, but not quick-quick.
Actually had one come past me on the way home tonight, first time Ive seen one on the...
Get any of the cars down from Crail OR York and try to match the times at Pod...
Neutral ground, FIA approved, well respected and theres no arguing then! ;)
So which is it?! ;)
They all vary so much though, I remember the first 172 I drove (mk1) it felt really tight and gutless below 5000rpm, then was ok on cam. It felt slower than my 106 GTi and confused the hell out of me.
However, the next one was a total contrast, strong low down...
Because the original post said "doesnt want to rev" and I said it felt "limp" but you said yours felt fine. So I am reading that as that your 182 is either the same, in which case your 172 must also have been a bit flat, or your 182 is as quick as your 172 already and is a good one!
Thats how I felt after my test drive...
Its the milage, or lack of thats the problem and they do take a few thou miles to bed in and start to get quicker.
The one I drove only had 600 miles on the clock and had so far been driven"normally" so it was still very tight and felt a bit limp.
Aye, it was a quick one...
When it was on the rollers it had loads more mid-range grunt than any other Clio there on the day, modded or not!!!
This is mine vs 2 standard 172s >>>...