Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Like Tony says, just get a lower profile tyre so the circumference of the wheel stays the same. That will also keep things like your speedo accurate as well.
Well in my opinion the way that EVO was weaving all over the bumper of that Elise was dangerous. You are right that the whole point of a trackday is to test the limits of your car but you must still be a little bit careful. Fair enough if you want to drift around a few bends but just make sure...
No you are right it is not a track car but she was on a track and should therefore drive accordingly. If she wanted to drive it like a rallye car then she should go on an off road day. As for you trying it yourself go for it, but trust be you will be black flagged before you know it.
"Thats funny tumbleweed - "I toasted a cup" you say So is yours quicker then than a cup?? "
Very possibly as the 172 engines loosen up quite considerably after a few thousand miles. Cups are all very new so the engines are probably a bit tight.
Yes I realise that but Renault must have got that figure from somewhere. Perhaps the mk1 that was weighed had the steel bonnet?? That might account for the difference. Either way it is pointless arguing. All we can say for sure is that the Cup is 89kg lighter than the mk2 and the mk1 falls...
The test has already been done. I think a mk1 and mk2 were tested with full tanks and the mk1 came out at 1100 and the mk2 at 1120.
If you have an aluminium bonnet you will probably know as it is incredibly light. You can lift it with your little finger!
The 1100kg was taken with a full tank of petrol. I think the 1035kg Renault quote is for an empty tank. Also there is some confusion over the weight of mk1s as the early ones came with aluminium bonnets and steel on the later ones which obviously affects the kerb weight.