Search results

I know it isn't. And what about my in? And why is it "for a shock"?

Any idea what torque is?

Re: WWDC 2011 Apple ID, technically.

Yep it is different.

Re: WWDC 2011 People in your phonebook, if they have an iPhone it automatically tries to send to them using iMessage.

Well the first thing it could be is due to the panel filter being dirty.

No I don't. I mean the throttle body.

Probably a combination of the sensor and the throttlebody being dirty then. Clean your throttlebody first.

It causes it to adjust the air to fuel temperature and also restrict the rev limit.

Both.

Diesel is for queers.

Water temperature sensor. Replace it.

iOS4 and yes, it won't. It isn't really fast enough.

LOL WUT? He's not after broadband, he's after hosting.

I'm in the same boat, gotta love the Apple warranty.

Obvious Troll is obvious.

Yep. FWD is the win in the snow. 4WD is not needed, all that will do is help you go faster, not stop faster. My old 206 GTi was the f**king boss last winter, my parents rang me up because they both have RWD cars and were stuck in rural Lincolnshire. I got through, easy-f**king-peasy.

Yeah, except that's for a 1.2 16v Clio. Not a 172.

Fairy Liquid will strip wax, but be very careful.

I had this on my 206 GTi in the cold weather a breather pipe frozen up and caused huge pressure in the block, the oil started to shoot out the dipstick. I yanked the pipe off, topped the oil up and she was fine. Breather was £10 from Pug, god they had cheap spares looking back...

I've had so many replacements for minor things tbh. My battery is a c**t too, I went to the cinema the other night it was on 15% so I turned it off for the film and then it wouldn't turn on afterwards because the battery was too low. A load of horseshit if you ask me.

Mine is the same Mr Pants. I'm trekking to Sheffield on Sunday to see what the Apple minions say.

You can't.

They are usually so fast that it doesn't matter.

Quad bluff.

Well since EXIF data is so easily faked any way, why not? Double bluff?

You posted the EXIF data from that picture (which is Meta Data about the photo). This can be faked, I was trying to make you aware of that. Also if I take a picture on my camera, open it in PS to clean it up and a bit and then save it, it'll show up that it was edited in PS. So it's hardly proof...

Yes I obviously read the article before posting it. I'm just made a point to you before that Meta information means sod all, since it can be faked any way.

http://gizmodo.com/5827839/is-this-the-iphone-5-slim/

Doesn't mean it's 'shopped though. Just edited in.