Search results

Re: Clio sports in bedfordshire Just seen this. This is me http://www.cliosport.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?151-519-Automotive

you're doing the calculation wrong. double that duty cycle

the size of the nozzle makes no difference. injecting into a pressurised vessel (the plenum) will reduce the injected pressure. so 4 - 1.6 = 2.4 but then you add plenum pressure to the regulator, increasing your overall fuel pressure back to what you started with. so 2.4 + 1.6 = 4

what car is it?

pollen filter been changed recently? might be very blocked and not letting enough fresh air in so effectively doing what would happen if recirc was on

I have!! that's what the americans use as a benchmark, and generally american ATW figures are regarded as being the same as UK/European ATF figures. If that were what you have then it's a seriously powerful car and well done

boost control solenoid?

not strictly true, not more fuel, just not less fuel due to manifold pressure holding it back. That's what the vacuum compensation on the regulator is for. Thats why injectors are a lot easier to max out on cars with a single fuel line and an in-tank regluator, no compensation, so the fuel...

any damage to the loom by the ECU plug? are the earths and the surpressor wires all attached and in good condition?

1&4 suggests the coilpack as those cylinders use the same half of the coil. Speed sensor fault might be simply that it doesn't have one, I've seen that before. The O2 sensor needs some live data looking at

lol, might have done ;) i'd been waiting for the details for 9 hours though. I did lol hard at the "can i have them next month" posts from some people

yes, you'll need to root the phone.

the maths (rule of thumb) say they will do 307 at 80% and 384 at 100% at 3bar (flywheel) bumping pressure will give a little more headroom, but not a lot. I'd say it was a little optomistic for wheel power, but it's a really impressive build none the less

LOL much as i dont want to feed the troll................the cylinder spacing is completely different, you'd be lowering the compression, have nowhere for a glow plug, or a diesel injector and just wouldn't work in any way Now i'd you have said a K4M head, at least you'd have had the...

cams????

that's the chassis code.......... EPIC fail ;)

any money on Robert Barrington?

a diesel that makes peak power at 6.5k? and less torque than bhp?????? rofl, dreamer

I'd be checking the bolts in the holes with the wheel off first, see if the seat is protruding at all. If it is then the wheel wont be held tight to the hub. If they bolt up ok and dont wobble, then.....well, have to make a judgement call on it really

looks like the bolts have come loose on them at some point and worn the hole a bit bigger. Hard to say without trying them, but the seat on a wheelbolt is fairly big

same story every time, if you have to have the reasons to like something explained to you, you'll never really get it. If you like and want something done, then do it for you, not for people you've never met and tbh if they have such dramatically different opinions, you probably dont like them...

renault for the sensor, easy enough to fit

speedo sensor fault can cause some very odd issues that you wouldn't expect

there's definitely a newer version of the crank. The difference it makes in reality is speculation You can fit a 182 plenum to a 172 engine very easily, you just have to leave out 1 fairly insignificant bolt and block off one of the vacuum take offs (whichever you dont use for the carbon canister)

ROFL, no contest tbh. I've left an E46 for dead in a sc clio

it's 21mm sod using a spanner though. Deep socket and keep the car on the ground until it's undone

at the very least you'll need a t28 turbo, or better still a GT28RS meggy injectors will do 320-330 ish bhp, but that's reduced if you keep the single fuel line setup as there's no pressure compensation. I'd never even consider a stock ECU for something as drastic

yes

my personal recommmendation would be to leave the water pump alone and go the aux kit