Search results

Teg's are a lot pricier though! Especially for the 98 spec, which is the only one I'd consider.

From the car leaving the bodyshop To a brief introduction to a pheasant. Did have to laugh at the feathers strewn down the car. Think people in the carpark thoughti was going all basil fawlty as I ripped the splitter off!

Tbf dan knows his stuff with car audio, I'd go with his advise.

I drive a vrs on a regular basis. If you're going to talk 0-60, yes the Clio is quicker. But all 0-60 is relevant for is pub talk. Performance diesels always look slower on paper, but then we don't drive our cars on paper, do we?

That would be me lol. How long ago was that?

Doesn't matter why. Just because it doesn't make sense to you/me/bob doesn't change the fact that there are buyers out there willing to pay lots.

True. But for a car that's going to rack up 20k miles a year? And track days?

pnuijDieOvY http://www.cliosport.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=42 It's not like there's a guide forum clearly visible. Hang on.....

Any particular reason for the conversion?

Track use, or purely road?

You need a guide for the guides section?

Comes with original suspension and steering wheel. Tbh I'm 50/50 on selling it. If it goes for close to asking before the ATrader ad runs out, cool. If not it's staying. http://www.kw-suspension.co.uk/variant-2.htm

Shame, if he was nearer could have a shot in mine.

Where's he based? (Oh and not turini's, ultraleggera's!)

I've never run harnesses because I don't have a cage. CG lock, that's all. I agree completely, no harnesses without a cage.

I agree that a cage would be ideal for a track car, but for me it would lose too much as a daily driver to go that far.

Not with 20k a year miles.

Option 2. I've owned both (Trophy and V2's). Once setup correctly, it's as good on road as a Trophy, but better on track. Trophy's don't work as well as a standard 182 on track, not as throttle adjustable. Add a whiteline ARB to the V2's, and it's an incredible setup. Although bin the 2118's...

So sad:cry:

But financially, surely the 500 will retain more?

It's pearl black, the wrap is a matt clear coat from what I've heard.

Thats exactly what I wanted from my car (the one Robbos kindly mentioned). Useable every day ( I do a lot of miles! ) but still great for b-roads/track. That's why I still have full interior, bluetooth, all sound deadening etc, suspension that's compliant for road use but easily adjustable for...

Whatever you do, remove the fronts. f**king hazards.

People underestimate the Fabia's, as they look pretty ordinary and upright. Good cars though. Oddly I could never get comfortable in the drivers seat, kept getting cramp.

The 172's a much better drivers car, but straight line pace there's bugger all in it.

If you're reading this, you're only encouraging me.

Not planning ring trips?

You're slipping. It's all the torques and seats.

Pretty sure it's woopsie doo. Sorry xx

Not sure if you've considered it, but I wouldn't rule out a late, well looked after 172. Same shape, exhaust is cheaper when it breaks, and you've more options than a cup packed 182 if you're ever thinking of coilovers. Wish I'd never sold my 1st 172 for the 182 tbh.