Search results

love it, its so cumfy, well built, nice to drive and handles awesome! it lacks power, got a nice torque band but imo needs 220lb/ft or so! (they have 180 as standard) ive rarely had it over 2.5krpm just cruise about in it. 2krpm in 6th gear is 75mph. however so far its not been great on fuel...

wandering in a straight line will be the rear dampers, its one of they feelings you cant put your finger on it but it just doesnt feel right!! go into a damp roundabout a little faster than you normally would and lift off and you will soon tell if the rears are gone!!! i wouldnt be paying...

just got mine today thought it was worth a try at only £16.99 and turns out its pretty good! well impressed by it. worth a try for anyone looking to go wireless, comes with a tiny USB receiver, that controls the both of them so only needs one usb port, free delivery and includes batteries...

clean the throttle body out i bet thats whats causing it. is it the 1.4 16v? its similar to the 1.6 16v which suffers from this problem quite badly

i think the OP has possibly used the wrong term, driven hard and possibly means fast flowing driving? my ph1 is awesome on fuel on a nice summers day just driving down a nice twisty road at 60/70/80mph hardly braking hardly acclerating just flowing in and out the bends.

ignore the haters, if it makes you happy do it. 2.0 conversion, insured as a 1.2 = the future.

had this on my old 1.2 16v dynamique, was the rear washer jet line, it runs up the near side and was leaking at a joint behind the rear n/s door card, i bet you a tenner its that!

few snow pictures from the other day, what a noisey pair these are lol!! currently trying to source a set of white 197/200 speedlines for the DCi and a set of 40mm springs

Re: Flame Red DCI 80 Sport Rep this is looking awesome now!! just needs a DCI 100 turbo, Intercooler and remap to finish it off!! i miss my old mapped 100 :(

ph1 FTMFW!!!!

my mrs has a mk2 one and her sis a mk3 one, nice refined engine for about town however doesnt have the power to warrant the terrible fuel consumption, the mk2 does 38mpg on a decent run, the same as my 172 and the mk3 is worse. if your coming from something quick, go for something cheap to run...

my ph1 is only 12mpg off what my DCi does!! mk3s are fukin tanks!!!

fuking lol, as said 17s would look good on it. all you needed for megane RS wheels was a set of wheel adators, same idea as fitting 197 wheels to a non RS Clio...

phase 1 172. end thread.

LOL! nice car though dude i like them, could do with a bit slammage tho!

haha awesome, i like that, needs to go lower at the rear though

lol screw that, my '72 does more than that!

not worth going any less than 60mm, especialy on 15", 40mm looks hardly any different!!

looks brilliant, get yourself over to www.cliodci.net

must have new wheels for mine lol

initiale is the top spec, better spec than the 182 in many ways! dynamiques also came with rare optional extras such as xenons, colour sat nav, ESP, cruise control, 6 disc changers, cabasse head unit, climate control and electric sunroof. 1.2s are cheap and cheerful but not very good to...

some 15" OZ F1 cups from a mk1 172, 60mm apex springs, dual optic headlights and anything else that takes ur fancy would soon sort it out!

changing the alternator on my 172 this week, so assuming i need a new belt, what about tensioner? just do the full lot?

i paid £2600 3rd party at 18 on my 172, was worth every penny and id do it again.

172 originals are these ones... your thinking of 182 wheels welcome hope you enjoy the car, wont be as quick but will be just as fun and a lot cheaper to run!!

f1s all the way

47 to 57mpg, ill have some of what your smoking, and ill do you a part exchange for my dci?

not really iirc ECU was changed too, of course its possible but in reality not really. as ali said, pre 04 engines are plagued with issues. i blew one up lol

slow and rubbish on fuel it was more popular than the diesel as it was about £1k cheaper when new.

id go 1.5dci wouldnt bother with any petrol non sports