Search results

well, it wont need a remap as the ecu is perfectly able to run closed loop no worries and can calculate flow with the MAP/TPS/CAS/IAT sensors. If the new 180 clio can get 8bhp (14bhp if you, like me, know its more like 166bhp std) from a better cast manifold then decent head and manifold work...

you can get it running 200bhp on the std plenham setup, but youll need to whip it all off.

has the head sheard off so there is only a stud on? If so then jsut take the wheel off, whack the stud with a lump hammer then use 2 nuts locked together or a mole grip to twist it out, or tighten it till it falls out the back of the hub. If not, then erm.......easy outs are the only method...

ingenius!

sorry grandpa......your 400K bently will be here soon.......

happy customers are repeat customers, and happy customers are the ones that get told their cars has the most bhp.

amen bro!

yea, but what im saying is that for it to really spray everywhere that it can fuel an engine on vapour/droplets then its gotta have some really special aperature wise rather than spurting out a 1/2" fitting or whatever that car has. Then youll shortly have problems with the engine seizing to...

if it was calibrated correctly, which isnt hard, then it should be as accurate as an accurate thing........for wheel bhp that is.

cause green is ming and a bad luck colour.

yea, but i bought mine off a scotsman :P

only if you got those orange split rims! lol.

spot on dood, i had an hr to tighten the HB, replace both front flexis, unseize the rear compensator and buy a new clutch pedal rubber.

mate, lost your phone number! i want your head! :O

i hate it when people say that! all engines make most of their power in their higher rpm ranges. 16Vs make more torque & bhp per ltr than 8vs 16Vs per ltr can run at higer rpm and still keep a high VE where 8vs would tail off. true early 16vs were peaky due to poor design, but if you...

camber has less to do with turn-in than what everybody seems to think here. With massive camber you can get HORRIBLE straight line stability and snatchy turn in but exceedingly stable and terrific mid corner grip. Ofcourse it does affect initial turn in, but your playing with very small amounts...

exactly.

that theory is clutching at straws, especially since it was parked up, and the pressure/aperature combination would need to be something special to particulate/vapourise oil so that it could travel through the inlet & filtration system. I have no idea why it did it though.

erm people, its called viscosity change with temp! your all experiencing the norm.

Reference Description QTY Price ex VAT 1 77 00 838 095 SHOCK ABSORBER CL 2 ---3 40.00 2 77 01 470 089 KIT SUSPENSION CL 2 ---3 22.40 3 77 05 190 511 BOLT S/ABSORBR C2...

but if the feed wasnt connected it would simply be on the floor, not inside the cylinders.

Also various types of engine layout such as slant or V8s means a downdraught carb leads to a straighter shot. Downdraught bodies on a clio kinda means the bonnet is in the way and induction length is shorter and more convoluted than conventional side draughts.

why use 5 point anything!!! Just stick to DOT 4 or at most castrol response Super Dot 4 synthetic brake fluid. Firstly dot 5.1 will need more regular maintanence as itll absorb water quicker. Youll never reach its boiling point in general use, infact youll never reach it unless you drive at...

lmao!!! that brill...........well, sad, but a great storey for the kids lol.

wish they made them straight too! lol

read the posts!!!! its all been said, cause it has no dizzy setup on the exhaust cam and the manifolds wont line up.

well, what do you want, the 16V box will indefinately hand you better acceleration but you will loose some top speed. How lazy do you want the box to be?

At 0.5 - 0.6 bar your already running 7-8psi which is quite high for a low pressure system and i wouldnt go near 1bar without knowing what dynamic ratios you are going to run and what a dished std piston can take. i have no idea what your std parts will be up to, rods and crank should be...

physically or damping rates? Physically they are the same.

nice, just saw an LSD source a few days ago.......