Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I don't see how its physically possible to get the same (if not better?) mpg from a car with 2.0 litre engine weighing a over a ton as appose to a tiny 1.6 made from tin foil that only weighs ~800kg ...
As title says, was looking at getting one or the other but was going to go with VTS as I thought the MPG would be a fair bit better.
But parkers states the VTS as 33 MPG and a 172 as 34 MPG? Is this correct?
Thinking about getting a 172/182, how do they fare against business men in their dirty dervs?
Would love to see the look on their faces as I go past ... in a Clio :)
Don't think it will have service history or surely they would have stated it in the ad?
Although it could because they didn't put the mileage in the ad and i had to ring up for it!
So the mileage isn't to high?
Found a Dynamique, decided i'd rather have a little more power and go for the dCi 100, although they are a little harder to come by.
2004 on an '04 dCi 100 Dynamique
77k
£2,995
I know there are ones with lower mileage, but this one is fairly local to me, thoughts?
An inspirational thread, wish i had the knowledge how to do it myself!
I know a fair bit about cars, but where did you learn how to do all this? Books, courses or something else? I'm really interested in learning so i could do something similar
Thanks in advance :)
Didn't realise i was missing so much!
Will have to try and source a dCi 80 Dynamique now for my budget, which is going to be hard :(
EDIT: With decentish miles of couse
Looking at a new car and found this, is it any good? Considering its from a garage that is!
2002 '52 Clio dCi 80 Expression +
60k Miles
FSH
12 months MOT
£2,900
Sorry if this is the wrong section.
Thanks in advance.