0-100 for 182 cup

[Johnny_52]

how many secs?

 

[STEAMY WINDOWS]

17.5?

 

[Toypop]

Autocar 17.0

Evo 17.5 (2+, full tank usually)

 

[Martin]

If a 182 can do 0-100 in 17.5 secs with full fuel tank and 2 passengers Ill eat my hat!

 

[Mitchy]

So will i.

 

[Ali]

well they do 0-95 in 14.1 at santa pod sooooo...cant be far off!

 

[gazcaddy]

surely the figures dont lie, 17.5 in evo and 17 in autocar, i assumed they would do it with just the driver in the car and a small amount of fuel (i assume this is the same for all cars), what do you reckon the 182 will do it in then??

 

[geordiepaul]

Quote: Originally posted by Martin. on 02 April 2005

If a 182 can do 0-100 in 17.5 secs with full fuel tank and 2 passengers Ill eat my hat!

Whys that then? The 172 did 0-100 in that time in Autocar against the CTR!

 

[Martin]

Quote: Originally posted by AJRMOTORSPORT on 02 April 2005

well they do 0-95 in 14.1 at santa pod sooooo...cant be far off!

I havent seen a 182 run quicker than 15s so far...whose is this super fast example? A 182 will not run that time standard!

 

[Martin]

Quote: Originally posted by geordiepaul on 02 April 2005

Quote: Originally posted by Martin. on 02 April 2005

If a 182 can do 0-100 in 17.5 secs with full fuel tank and 2 passengers Ill eat my hat!

Whys that then? The 172 did 0-100 in that time in Autocar against the CTR!





Im not doubting that a 182 will do 17sec 0-100...its just there is NO WAY it would do that time with 2 passengers and a full tank of petrol. Thats around 210kgs on top of the kerb weight of 1060kg(?)!

 

[gazcaddy]

I thought the 182 does the 1/4 run in about 15 secs

 

[scotte666]

how quick does a williams do it?

 

[Martin]

Quote: Originally posted by scotte666 on 02 April 2005

how quick does a williams do it?

15s .....mid 15s usually with some being a bit quicker some a bit slower.....

 

[Dash]

PERFORMANCE
0-100 kph / 0-62 mph 7.7 secs
Maximum speed 134 mph/215 kph

Never new a Williams was this fast

 

[gunnergibson]

the williams requires 3 gear changes to get to 60 so people who estimate 0-100 based on the 0-60 time are stupid...

Why is it the Williams gets faster 1/4 times.... its proven! every drag meet i have been to the Williams cains 172s etc.

 

[Martin]

Quote: Originally posted by James on 02 April 2005

PERFORMANCE
0-100 kph / 0-62 mph 7.7 secs
Maximum speed 134 mph/215 kph

Never new a Williams was this fast

Williams power is good enough to take my car down the strip faster than a Clio V6!

 

[Mitchy]

Quote: Originally posted by AJRMOTORSPORT on 02 April 2005

well they do 0-95 in 14.1 at santa pod sooooo...cant be far off!

Where have you got this from?

Try 15secs @ around 94mph.

 

[gazcaddy]

Quote: Originally posted by Mitchy on 02 April 2005

Quote: Originally posted by AJRMOTORSPORT on 02 April 2005

well they do 0-95 in 14.1 at santa pod sooooo...cant be far off!

Where have you got this from?

Try 15secs @ around 94mph.





I would agree with that Mitchy seems about right, and about 17ish to 100

 

[Big Iain]

Quote: Originally posted by Mitchy on 02 April 2005

Quote: Originally posted by AJRMOTORSPORT on 02 April 2005

well they do 0-95 in 14.1 at santa pod sooooo...cant be far off!

Where have you got this from?

Try 15secs @ around 94mph.





you dont remember neils run at crail and Im sure chris n nic from here too got a 14.1

 

[Toypop]

In another issue of Evo that I got last summer they did a weird test with a range of cars from a 1.6 Focus as a control car all the way up the Caterham R500 and even a Porsche Cayenne.

Anyway they did a 0-100 test 2up and with a full tank but the catch was that the track was wet and it still did it in 18 or 19.

 

[JayGTT]

100 mph on the speedo or on eletronic timing gear??

 

[Toypop]

They were using one of those devices that they always use that measures G forces and all sorts. Cant remember the name of it now. Thought those types of devices (not neccessarily that exact same model though) are used to measure world records like that 0-100-0 thing...

 

[Mitchy]

Iain, Neil and chriss clios are modded and stripped down to the skin and running on petrol fumes.

I think theres a bit of a difference!! Not saying a clio is not capable of 14.1, i am saying it is not capable of 14.1 in standard trim!

I believe the time will be around 17-17.5secs!

 

[Big Iain]

was just pointing out what ajr said

 

[Neil82]

LMAO I did the 14.1 when I was 15 stone 4 and have since come down to 11 st 2. I could run with full interior right now and still be lighter than back then easily. Mitchy I take it you have never felt the weight of the Cup bench? It weighs F.A!

 

[JayGTT]

17 seconds sound right to me

 

[Andyvalver]

I know this isnt the most accurate times but http://www.letstorquebhp.com/http://www.letstorquebhp.com/

182 = 16.94 sec to 100 on here and 14.94 1/4mile.

Id say it does a ton in 17 to 17.5 secs then or maybe this is right.

 

[Tom]

Why is this important?

I mean when is knowing your car can do 0-100 in whatever time going to have any use? Bragging rights?

Its a clio, nobody understands.

 

[JayGTT]

Quote: Originally posted by Andyvalver on 02 April 2005


I know this isnt the most accurate times but http://www.letstorquebhp.com/http://www.letstorquebhp.com/

182 = 16.94 sec to 100 on here and 14.94 1/4mile.

Id say it does a ton in 17 to 17.5 secs then or maybe this is right.

im impressed thats fairly accurate its spot on with my GTT times..

 

[dk]

Quote: Originally posted by Mitchy on 02 April 2005
Quote: Originally posted by AJRMOTORSPORT on 02 April 2005well they do 0-95 in 14.1 at santa pod sooooo...cant be far off![/QUOTE]Where have you got this from?Try 15secs @ around 94mph.

this is about right

 

[MickeyO]

Quote: Originally posted by Andyvalver on 02 April 2005


I know this isnt the most accurate times but http://www.letstorquebhp.com/http://www.letstorquebhp.com/

182 = 16.94 sec to 100 on here and 14.94 1/4mile.

Id say it does a ton in 17 to 17.5 secs then or maybe this is right.





that says a 182 cup is faster than the 172 cup

thats not true though is it!?

 

[Ian_182]

The 182 cup has posted a faster 0-60 than the 172 cup iirc

6.3-60 in autocar last year

Anyways 17 secs sounds about right to me

ian

 

[STEAMY WINDOWS]

who cares about .0001secs or whatever they all test them on different days we know they isnt much in them

 

[Nick Read]

Quote: Originally posted by Tom on 02 April 2005


Why is this important?

I mean when is knowing your car can do 0-100 in whatever time going to have any use? Bragging rights?

Its a clio, nobody understands.

LOL tell that to the M3 driver that couldnt keep up with me at the Ring and then came over in the car park, he wasnt gutted or anything, appreciative would be the best word. But then mine does 0-100 in the 11s. (Bragging )

Anyway, to get to the point, if the car does a quarter mile in 14-15 @95mph then 0-100 in 17 is about right. That extra 5mph takes more at 95 onwards than it does at any other time in an acceleration run.

 

[Rich-D]

Quote: Originally posted by Neil82cup on 02 April 2005





Mitchy I take it you have never felt the weight of the Cup bench? It weighs F.A!

Weighed the bits when I stripped the back of my Cup...

Rear Seat (lower) - 5kg

Rear Sear (upper) - 10kg

Seat Mount Bar - 3kg

Jack & toolkit - 4kg

Parcel shelf - 1.5kg

Boot Carpet - 2kg



Total = 25.5kg



Makes a whopping 4bhp/tonne difference, so basically fcuk all.

 

[Mitchy]

If it makes no difference, why spend 1/2 an hour ripping it out and an hour putting it back in?

 

[Neil82]

Quote: Originally posted by Mitchy on 03 April 2005
If it makes no difference, why spend 1/2 an hour ripping it out and an hour putting it back in?


It takes me literally 10 minutes.

 

[Mrdemon]

Mitchy is just pissed he not got a 182 beating car lol

 

[Rich-D]

Quote: Originally posted by Mitchy on 03 April 2005



If it makes no difference, why spend 1/2 an hour ripping it out and an hour putting it back in?

Doesnt on the Cup as the rear seats are already lightened, theres no spare, etc... but on other cars it does add up to a decent amount of weight saving.

 

[Mitchy]

Quote: Originally posted by Mrdemon on 03 April 2005

Mitchy is just pissed he not got a 182 beating car lol

LOL