172 vs 172 cup vs 182

[chris_cup]

with inspiration from caveman thread i was just wondering what you guys thought?

my two cents is that i love the ethos of the 172 cup and thge overall " for speed add lightness"

 

[Poopensharten]

Watch out, worms are escaping from that there can

 

[gaz44]

Very little difference between them on the road.

Cup on the track.

Comfort spec or simple spec - depends what you want.

 

[Sir_Dave]

 

[Bazzon]

PH1 > all i heard............

 

[alanc1000]

they are all getting old and knackared now, so you are entering into territory of how well they have been maintained.

 

[realnumber 1]

they are all getting old and knackared now, so you are entering into territory of how well they have been maintained.

lol, I think that depends what you class as old and knackared.

 

[Greeny.]

Cup has the best bang for your buck all day long. 182's are nice but generally more under powered than 172's judging from a few on our RR day the other month, obviously more expensive as well, heavier but normally have lower miles of course.

 

[Ads_172]

This really has been done to death, been re-born "Jesus-style" and then died again...