go out and time yourself then you'll kno exactly what urs is compared to othersI've looked at the times and from 0-60 the Trophy is quicker, not sure about the 172 though. The only trouble with looking up 0-60 times is that it says different times from different sources........
They are rapid, especially mid range. All very well having an orchestrated race but in the real world they would own a Clio.
Not likely. From experience, good car, great engine, but (especially with runflats) just too stiff across the front, lots of wheelspin and washes into understeer if your clumsy.get what you pay for mini will be faster and handle better!
In a straight line, nothing else at the same price will be quicker.I kept up with one with the guy pulling out and not really passing. wasnt that impressive for the money he will have paid
anyone got a link to the stats per chance? - goods cars IMO
The Clio on the other hand, a real mans car
The Clio on the other hand, a real mans car
The new mini looks better than the old one
The Clio on the other hand, a real mans car
Thats the worst looking 6r4 I've ever seen.
The new mini looks better than the old one
Wrong
get what you pay for mini will be faster and handle better!
It's very different, pulls much harder than the old unit. They've done VW's trick, most are testing at 180-185bhp standard, then you've got the overboost pushing it to 200ish bhp.one of my mates has the old charged mini's said there was nothing in it between my 172 and that. imagine the tubo version isnt much different!
Thats the worst looking 6r4 I've ever seen.now thats a wild claim!!
its a newer breed of car and a 172 will be no match for it, go drive the new turbo charged s and its a very muscular engine.