Probably all come down to driver but i know a lot of the engines once run in are churning out more power than stated from vaux! Check out the actual 0-60 http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/greatest_drives/210003/vauxhall_corsa_vxr.html
Also engine re-maps can increase power by loads as they are turbo's.
Got the same engine in the meriva and although this isn't as quick as the 182 chipped and air filtered was from a standstill - rolling it is surprisingly fast as got a 5 sec overboost function when flooring it!
Still think clio kicks arse when corners or roundabouts involved though!
Probably all come down to driver but i know a lot of the engines once run in are churning out more power than stated from vaux! Check out the actual 0-60 http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/greatest_drives/210003/vauxhall_corsa_vxr.html
Also engine re-maps can increase power by loads as they are turbo's.
Got the same engine in the meriva and although this isn't as quick as the 182 chipped and air filtered was from a standstill - rolling it is surprisingly fast as got a 5 sec overboost function when flooring it!
Still think clio kicks arse when corners or roundabouts involved though!
Whats the overboost ?
And how does that work ?
Does it just tweak the boost up electronically when you hit a button while cars going ?
a friend has one but have yet to race/experience it!
lovely cars though!
a friend has one but have yet to race/experience it!
lovely cars though!
But i wonder how long it is before they go under the 10 grand mark price wise, being a vauxhall :rasp:
Whats the overboost ?
And how does that work ?
Does it just tweak the boost up electronically when you hit a button while cars going ?
But i wonder how long it is before they go under the 10 grand mark price wise, being a vauxhall :rasp:
holds its value at 55%
39% on any renualt bar a V6
not in a stright drag race. Assuming it was chipped to 230bhp like nearly all places do. 0-60 would be 5.9 seconds and 0-100 in 14.3Been in my pals chipped one and wasn't impressed at all, by the performance or looks. My old Clio Cup with breathing mods would have went passed a chipped one with ease.
Assuming its dry and no torque steer occurs (plus I don’t let go of the steering when I drive so torque steer isn’t a issue unlike J. Clarkson), Its just maths. Most people on here with a re-mapped and breathing modded 172 cup will get around 180bhp. Giving them a figure of 174 BHP per tonne.Not necessarily the VXR already torque steers, 230bhp would just make this worse.
I'd rather have the Cup with a set of fresh Pilot Exaltos and no wheel spin or torque steer.
I'd rather have the Cup with a set of fresh Pilot Exaltos and no wheel spin or torque steer.
My Clio Cup used to 14.1 secs to 101 with 181 hp. I've been looking about on the VXR forum and there is no way a chipped 220-230 hp one will do 14.1@101 1/4 mile.not in a stright drag race. Assuming it was chipped to 230bhp like nearly all places do. 0-60 would be 5.9 seconds and 0-100 in 14.3Been in my pals chipped one and wasn't impressed at all, by the performance or looks. My old Clio Cup with breathing mods would have went passed a chipped one with ease.
a 180bhp cup would get to 60 in about 6.3 and 100 in 16.30 ish.
Think you mates is knackered.
I did say it was maths. From http://www.letstorquebhp.com/calculator.aspMy Clio Cup used to 14.1 secs to 101 with 181 hp. I've been looking about on the VXR forum and there is no way a chipped 220-230 hp one will do 14.1@101 1/4 mile.not in a stright drag race. Assuming it was chipped to 230bhp like nearly all places do. 0-60 would be 5.9 seconds and 0-100 in 14.3
a 180bhp cup would get to 60 in about 6.3 and 100 in 16.30 ish.
Think you mates is knackered.
same like a said in post two. its all down the driver!i honestly dont think there is anything in it!! a friend has a VXR but i am get to play with it in my cup!!
I did say it was maths. From http://www.letstorquebhp.com/calculator.aspMy Clio Cup used to 14.1 secs to 101 with 181 hp. I've been looking about on the VXR forum and there is no way a chipped 220-230 hp one will do 14.1@101 1/4 mile.
But I am 100% confident that a 230bhp vxr would get to 100 quicker than I 172cup
ok well that will never happen as you dont have it anymore. BUT imo in a strightline the vxr would have it.I did say it was maths. From http://www.letstorquebhp.com/calculator.asp
But I am 100% confident that a 230bhp vxr would get to 100 quicker than I 172cup
Haha letstorque what a load of tripe, stop torquing b****cks... Fact is my Clio Cup with 181 hp (tested at dastek) did a 14.1@101 and would beat a chipped VXR up the 1/4 mile. I would put some serious money on my old Cup beating a chipped VXR with me driving.
Tiff a few years back did a similar comparison with a 182 and civic type R. where the type R won by about the same amount. Tiff said it handled that bit better too, but there are many on here with stories of when they saw of a CTR in there 182’s. So I’m not too bothered about that review.Tiff Needel did back to back laps of cadwell one in a 197 and one in the vxr corsa sometime. They were both standard demonstrators provided by the manufacturer. I think the 197 was a clear couple of seconds ahead over the lap so a 172 cup would be quicker still i reckon as it's not as lardy as the 197. I think both cars standard, on a 1/4 mile would be pretty close. Probably only a matter of feet, but a lap of a racetrack with bends it'd be the cup.
As more of a handling fan I just thought i'd a new element to the discussion!
the corsa gets brilliant reviews about the handling ppl just seem to think cause old corsa were s**t this 1 handles s**t,the thing is once u buy a car in 6months u want more power nd u can with vxr's u cannot with clios(very expensive) most hot hatchs r going forced induction for a reason ppl like torque
Tiff a few years back did a similar comparison with a 182 and civic type R. where the type R won by about the same amount. Tiff said it handled that bit better too, but there are many on here with stories of when they saw of a CTR in there 182’s. So I’m not too bothered about that review.Tiff Needel did back to back laps of cadwell one in a 197 and one in the vxr corsa sometime. They were both standard demonstrators provided by the manufacturer. I think the 197 was a clear couple of seconds ahead over the lap so a 172 cup would be quicker still i reckon as it's not as lardy as the 197. I think both cars standard, on a 1/4 mile would be pretty close. Probably only a matter of feet, but a lap of a racetrack with bends it'd be the cup.
As more of a handling fan I just thought i'd a new element to the discussion!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4-PI_rES6k
I did say it was maths. From http://www.letstorquebhp.com/calculator.aspMy Clio Cup used to 14.1 secs to 101 with 181 hp. I've been looking about on the VXR forum and there is no way a chipped 220-230 hp one will do 14.1@101 1/4 mile.
But I am 100% confident that a 230bhp vxr would get to 100 quicker than a 180bhp 172cup
not in a stright drag race. Assuming it was chipped to 230bhp like nearly all places do. 0-60 would be 5.9 seconds and 0-100 in 14.3Been in my pals chipped one and wasn't impressed at all, by the performance or looks. My old Clio Cup with breathing mods would have went passed a chipped one with ease.
a 180bhp cup would get to 60 in about 6.3 and 100 in 16.30 ish.
Think you mates is knackered.
not in a stright drag race. Assuming it was chipped to 230bhp like nearly all places do. 0-60 would be 5.9 seconds and 0-100 in 14.3
a 180bhp cup would get to 60 in about 6.3 and 100 in 16.30 ish.
Think you mates is knackered.
5.9 secs...I would like to se that.
172 Cup v VXR - who gives a toss? Cup's aren't about straight line speed. I know which handles better.