Im just abou to take proud ownership of a 182 and a mate of mine with a cooper s reckons that his car is not only faster but also handles better. I think he is talking crap but anyone else have any other opinions?
Quote: Originally posted by bonza172 on 11 May 2005
im sure we have had a topic like this before and im sure the outcome was that 172s n 182s are both faster and handle better. cooper s drivers just think there better than anyone most of the time
I thought the new Cooper S had gone from 167bhp to 170bhp, not 200?? Thats what it was when I was looking 6months ago, unless it has been upgraded again. The works is 210bhp though.Quote: Originally posted by morphed clio on 11 May 2005
Just to add some information. the current Cooper S is 200BHP and the S works version is 210BHP. Even though it has more power the mini is a lard bucket so IMO i believe the 182 would win.
Quote: Originally posted by Serif on 11 May 2005
Quote: Originally posted by Chris1.4RT on 11 May 2005
in my experience against both, I can slightly ease ahead of CooperSs but not quite with 172s never mind 182.
My vts handles better than all though.
Well, having very recently moved over from a VTS to a 182 with CUP suspension, Ill pick up on that last line. Im still getting used to the 182 but the thing that struck me most so far is that it feels like it has much more grip than my VTS (which is wearing newish Michelin Pilot Exaltos).
Im not yet convinced the 182 is quite as agile as the Saxo but Ill wait until Im a bit more tuned to the car before Im sure, and of course if youve just spent squillions of quid rebuilding the suspension on your car then all bets are off.
[Edited by Serif on 5/11/2005 2:23:05 PM]
The last line was just a tongue in cheek remark to spark reaction!
Yeah it is the price of the Mini that lets it down. I gave my Cooper back to the garage when I got my clio (b*s*a*d* only gave me 11K for it), and they put it up on the fourcourt for 13K. It was a year old with 26,000miles on the cklock. OK it did have a load of extras on it, and cost close to 15K new, but 13K for a second hand car that doesnt even compete with the clio is just stupid. I priced a new Cooper S up and it came to about 17.5KQuote: Originally posted by Ben H on 11 May 2005
I think a standard Cooper S is about Valver performance (i.e. low 20s to the ton), which is plenty to keep a 172/182 in sight - but certainly not enough to pass one. Autocar fanned the flames by saying the 172 Cup was in another performance league to the MCS, but still, is that what its all about?
The killer issue for the Cooper S is its price. Its an excellent hot hatch and probably the most direct competitor to the 172/182, given the size - but spec one up with some basics like air con and the price leaps. I think a comparably specd Cooper S runs to £17.5k, with little prospect of a discount. Youd get a 182 for £5k less quite easily.
Id very seriously be interested in a Cooper S (esp. one with the Works package), but theyre simply too expensive new, or used for that matter. I dont think you could even pick up a similar age Mini One for the price of an equaivalent used 172. Ill wait and see how good the new Mk3 Renaultsport is, but its likely to make a much better case for itself over a used MCS.
Owned. lol.Quote: Originally posted by y0z2a on 11 May 2005
would you like to see what my cup did to a cooper s?
http://www.thebigsleep.co.uk/upload/y0z2a_coopers_killing.wmvhttp://www.thebigsleep.co.uk/upload/y0z2a_coopers_killing.wmv
:-D
have mudered works cars in the past.
Went to a mini2 day at brunty with fred and roamer, and it was hilarious, as we mullered the lot of them.
/y0z
We dont think, we know.Quote: Originally posted by SOHROB on 12 May 2005
do all 172/182 owners think they have the fastest cars in world ?