ClioSport.net
Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
ForceIndia
ClioSport Club Member
Gentlemans spec 200
There's not a huge difference between them. Late 172's had cruise, so identical spec wise. 172 exhaust is cheaper to replace when it falls off.
Given the similarity between them I'd go for the best condition available.
I'm selling a 172 soon, I'll pm you once the ad goes up if you're interested.
Given the similarity between them I'd go for the best condition available.
I'm selling a 172 soon, I'll pm you once the ad goes up if you're interested.
Depends what you want it for and your budget! Would imagine it would be pretty hard to get a mint 172 with low miles on it that hasn't been ragged. 182 would probably be my choice...bit newer, but still as every bit capable.
Try a search...am sure you will find plenty of information that will answer your question.
Try a search...am sure you will find plenty of information that will answer your question.
ForceIndia
ClioSport Club Member
Gentlemans spec 200
They will all of been ragged!
Milltek'd clio 182
182 all the wayyyy
330i. E30 Touring.
PMSL at getting one that's not been ragged.
The worst thing you can try and do, imo. I bought one which had been used for a 2 mile trip to work, and the guy had a TVR, so it never got much stick. As soon as I started pushing it hard, the thing went wrong a million times.
Show me a high miler that's been pushed hard all it's life, please.
The worst thing you can try and do, imo. I bought one which had been used for a 2 mile trip to work, and the guy had a TVR, so it never got much stick. As soon as I started pushing it hard, the thing went wrong a million times.
Show me a high miler that's been pushed hard all it's life, please.
to be fair as well these cars are designed and built to be ragged, as long as its been looked after it will be fine. never understand the people on this site that say they never drive there rs clio hard or fast, whats the point in owning it get a luxury salon if you want a cruiser.
535d / t5 caravelle
fully f**king agreed on that, i got myself a mint sorrento green 205 1.9 gti back in there day, one lady owner 41k, full history, every receipt etc etc, cost me a fortune in repairs, like you say, if they ain't been ragged, they dont like it lol
172 cup
Im also looking to buy a 172/182 but am torn between the 2... :S
Anyone have any idea which is better on fuel?
Anyone have any idea which is better on fuel?
GW Stage 2 R26
Both the same on fuel.. Same engine.. 182 with cup packs feels more planted/ solid than a phase 2 172.. And looks better.
I dont like the wheelbarrow look of the 182.
I dont think there is a right or wrong answer though, it all depends on what matters to you as they are all a compromise.
Phase 1 172 is hideous interior
Phase 2 172 doesnt have cruise (well most dont)
Only the cup have the better wishbones and suspension
Only the trophy have the sachs dampers
Cups and trophys dont have xenons
182 has better exhaust manifold
We have built what me and my mrs to be the ideal blend of parts now, we started with a 172 with xenons and aircon etc and then have retrofitted cruise control, 182 trophy seats, 172 cup suspension, 172 cup wishbones, 197 cams, 182 exhaust manifold.
So basically IMHO whatever one you get you'll end up wanting parts off one of the other ones, as renault never got it quite right IMHO!
I dont think there is a right or wrong answer though, it all depends on what matters to you as they are all a compromise.
Phase 1 172 is hideous interior
Phase 2 172 doesnt have cruise (well most dont)
Only the cup have the better wishbones and suspension
Only the trophy have the sachs dampers
Cups and trophys dont have xenons
182 has better exhaust manifold
We have built what me and my mrs to be the ideal blend of parts now, we started with a 172 with xenons and aircon etc and then have retrofitted cruise control, 182 trophy seats, 172 cup suspension, 172 cup wishbones, 197 cams, 182 exhaust manifold.
So basically IMHO whatever one you get you'll end up wanting parts off one of the other ones, as renault never got it quite right IMHO!
GW Stage 2 R26
172 looks to much like a 1.2 for me.. Especially in brown/marroon which a lot seem to be. The dampeners on the trophy corrode and are stupid money.. Plus it doesn't feel a lot different.. Cups are borderline scary in the wet with no abs when the tyres start to get low. A ff 182 with cup packs makes the most sense as a daily.. One with trend lines and add turinis and it's perick.. All IMO of corse.
172 cup
I think the 172 does look alot like a basic 1.2 clio but they seem to be easier on the bank account to buy than a 182 but im guessing theres a reason for that somewhere... :dapprove:
I much prefer the look of a 182 but as i do a fair ammount of miles each week i want something thats not going to be crippling heavey on fuel!
I much prefer the look of a 182 but as i do a fair ammount of miles each week i want something thats not going to be crippling heavey on fuel!
Ive owned a 182 it was a cracking car the only issues i had were the xenon lights which kept blowing and costing me a fortune and the exhaust is a pain in the ass and goes through hangars like no tomorrow so i'd say 172 FTW pal and there more throttle responsive aswell
172 cup
Thanks for all the help! I think its def gonna have to be a 182 
Ive got 3.5k to blow on a nice one so... my search begins in the next month or so! :lolup:
Ive got 3.5k to blow on a nice one so... my search begins in the next month or so! :lolup:
GW Stage 2 R26
They all are very similar on fuel. Will do 35mpg plus if you take it easy.. And 32 with some spirited driving... As said 182s are more as they are newer...
We easily get 40mpg out of our 172 on a run, and thats got cams and an RS2
Last edited:
GW Stage 2 R26
I see you live in Herefordshire?? I do too.. Ha. I've had 3x 182s a trophy and a 255 v6. Oh and a cup.. So if you need any advice just ask.. Where snouts are you??
182
Yeah, I've had 40mph out of mine too. Even more if I change gear.
I've had a smidge over 40mpg on long motorway runs. Slightly under if you have a heavy right foot.
172 cup
I live by Hay-on-Wye if u know where that is? :dapprove: Where abouts u from?
Im in hereford everyweekend and was talking to a mate last weekend who told me not to bother with a 172 as theyre rubbish on fuel compared to a 182 but thought a 2nd opinion would help.
GW Stage 2 R26
Yes I know where hay is. I've just moved from Hereford to near Leominster/ Ludlow.. I wouldn't listen.. They are all the same engine.. Very little difference.. They have been the most economical performance cars I've owned by a long way..
Your mate clearly knows NOTHING about clios if he said that.
Ol’ Tarby
ClioSport Moderator
Clio 220 Trophy
Incorrect as the 172 and 182, a pretty much identical
set a budget, and buy the best example you can afford, wether its a 172 or 182. Make sure it's had the belts done by a reputable specialist, or don't bother and move on to the next one
GW Stage 2 R26
I never got 40 out of any of mine I don't think.. But there are no motorways around here and I was young and thrashed them back then.. I never got 20 out of the v6..
Agreed there far to harsh my 182 was on apex springs the whole suspension was battered in 6 months :-(
Milltek'd clio 182
what an old thread, i had posted a 182 all the way lol on the first page. well after growing up i would have a phase 1 172 all the way now
