ClioSport.net

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

Clio 172 VS FRP VS Teg Type R

It's a scan of the original mag feature. I have it somewhere.

Pembrey iirc.

The "slowest" car there was actually quickest round the track. Still makes me laugh.
 
Click the article picture on the top right.

"For me, the clio is by far the most stimulating out of the naughty little threesome"

Well obviously.. ;)
 
All the reviews at the time hammered the FRP for it's price. If it had been only a couple of k more than a Clio, there would have been no argument.

But, then they'd just have woulnd up being destroyed like any given Clio
 
To be fair it was a ridiculous price to try and get.
 
It sure was.

But I remember when my mate got one after they'd beren out for 3 years, it was immaculate with sod-all miles on it, and had lost most of its value.

Came to bite him in the ass though when the brakes needed an overhaul, there wasn't a "specialist" option back then, so instead of footing the £1500 charge from ford he got a Civic Type-R instead. It was a sad day.

In fairness, on our buckled and knackered B-roads, my MX-3 used to hold onto it with conviction, mostly because I wasn't having my spine smashed in. On straights V6 power won out too, which, given I was 20hp down, was suprising.

Still, I'd have good examples of either, or both, on my driveway, without argument
 
Back
Top