Clio 182 0-60!

[gaz44]

yes

Whatever, all I'm saying is, most people will not achieve the published 0-60. Or they will a couple of times before something snaps. And I have seen a couple of V6's struggle to get below 7 seconds.

In gear times is where it's at.

 

[Munson]

With the level of traction the V6 has, I imagine you'd have to batter the clutch to get close to the claimed figures? Unless the claimed figures are very conservative like they are for the 182?

 

[Munson]

Whatever, all I'm saying is, most people will not achieve the published 0-60.

That is very true. Most people doing a reasonably quick start in a 182 won't do much better than 7.5 despite the fact that they will do 6.5 IF you batter the clutch & gearbox, which most sensible people don't do all day long.

 

[Poopensharten]

No two cars are built the same, 0-60 times will variate widley between them.

In the buying guide a few months back Evo said the Phase 1 touches 60 in 6.6

I have no idea how accurate there timing gear is etc, but so many factors involved like tyres/driver ability/driver weight/weather conditions etc

Its an impossibility, renault state 0-60 figures as a guide how they see it as an average out of a number of cars to give the buyer a wider understanding of how fast the car is. Some might do 0-60 in 6.2, others 7.5

 

[Alan]

No two cars are built the same, 0-60 times will variate widley between them.

In the buying guide a few months back Evo said the Phase 1 touches 60 in 6.6

I have no idea how accurate there timing gear is etc, but so many factors involved like tyres/driver ability/driver weight/weather conditions etc

Its an impossibility, renault state 0-60 figures as a guide how they see it as an average out of a number of cars to give the buyer a wider understanding of how fast the car is. Some might do 0-60 in 6.2, others 7.5

IIRC EVO use the Paisley rd west for 0-60 timing, last one to Mr Tasty buys the burgers.

 

[Poopensharten]

IIRC EVO use the Paisley rd west for 0-60 timing, last one to Mr Tasty buys the burgers.

Oh Hai!

x

 

[Scadden182]

My 172 hits warp 2 on good days (thats twice the speed of light for you noobs)

actually warp 2 is actually 8 times the spped of light...warp factors are supposedly converted to multiples of c with the cubic function s(w) = w3c, where w is the warp factor, s(w) is the velocity, and c is the speed of light.

tut noobs

 

[2 live]

the willy runs it in 5.6

0-100..bout 14-14.5

 

[moggy]

thought it was...

cup 6.9
stand 182 7.1

 

[Heliosphan]

thought it was...

cup 6.9
stand 182 7.1

But cars have tested quicker, 6.5 for the cup.

 

[Hitty86]

ive hit 6.6 in the 172 with a G-Tech Pro, Remapped and Cat Back.. Sound about right?

 

[alanc1000]

0-60 may be 6.3, but 0-62 the usual benchmark (0-100kph) is 6.6 IIRC.

 

[Ali]

Lucky to get them under 7tbh!

 

[alanc1000]

Lucky to get them under 7tbh!

Yeah true mine never felt anywhere near. Down hill maybe!

 

[polarbert]

They actually timed the car doing this. Maybe it was slightly better than a normal 182 with it being a press car.

Couldn't care less about 0-60 times anymore. Irrelevant besides pub talk.