^
I have to agree after owning and researching the more and more capable i realise the atr is. Found these aswel -
"Going Tsukaba time attack times with professional drivers the cars finish in this order -
1. DC5
2. ATR
3. ITR
4. EK9
5. CTR
REMEMBER that's with the JDM CTR and LSD!
The DC2 and CL1 are virtually identical in lap times on that short twisty track.
I personally believe over a more open track the top three would pull away from the CTR and EK9, the EK9 has a superb chassis but lacks the grunt to contend on longer tracks. The CTR doesn't carry the same corner speeds. "
Also a ATR DC2 comparison,
"As for acceleration there's nothing in it up to silly speeds where the DC2 runs out of puff a little bit.
Handling, well theres a french member (Frank) who kindly translated and posted up the results of a french magazine "Enchapment" which is as far as I'm aware the only offical review we've seen on a proper track with proper drivers, here's the cut and paste:
"Echappement" test around a track in France with Gilles Panizzi and Sebastien Loeb setting the lap times.
- Audi S4 V6 biturbo 265 hp: 1:37.09
- ATR: 1:38.04
- Honda Integra Type R: 1:38.06
- BMW M Coupé 321 hp and Hommel Berlinette RS 167 hp: 1:38.26
- Citroën Xsara VTS 167 hp: 1:40.51
- Alfa Romeo 155 2.5 V6 190 hp: 1:41.06
In their aftermaths comments, both Loeb and Panizzi find the ATR more understeering than the ITR and more supple (both wish the ATR could be stiffer), which in turn makes the ATR easier to drive and handle on demanding roads. Panizzi also adds that the ATR's brakes are another major quality, powerful and tireless.
So, all in all, better figures on paper for the DC2, but almost a tie on the track...
The track used for testing -
http://www.circuitmornay.com/ "