Also who "built" the Gen90?
If you know who "built" the Gen90, feel free to say; no-one's stopping you.
No need to be a pRick about it James. Maybe if I'd added the wink the post would of made more sense about it.
So let me get this straight; you're saying that you didn't put a wink in the post, so it didn't make complete sense, and because I mis-interpreted this, I'm a prick? What fantastic logic you have!
And as for your comment about the time taken to sort the dash out there is no way you can know what happened just by what I wrote. My blog/thread is worded so the average joe can follow the goings on with our car. Notr a totally minuite by minuite account with all the details.
To quote from your thread:
Jay Payne said:
This was supposed to be a simple install as all the wiring was there (all it needed was a live, earth and 2 CAN wires) but as is usual with this car something always goes wrong with the simplest of tasks. After several hours of messing about we came to the conclusion that the interface between the ecu and dash was at fault.
As you have said that your thread was written for the average joe, I'll happily elaborate for you on my logic, based on what you have written.
As you have said, wiring up two devices via CAN involves four wires for each device; power, ground CAN H and CAN L.
A CAN bus is two wires (not fibre optic or anything like that, just regular wire), which require 120 ohm termination at each end (either in the harness, or in the nodes at each end of the bus), giving you a resistance of 60 ohms across CAN H and CAN L. That's all there is to a high speed CAN bus.
To put two nodes onto the CAN bus, you literally just connect them up to the CAN H and CAN L connections, make sure the nodes are powered and running, and off you go.
If you have a CAN bus where nodes are not functioning, you do the following: check there is continuity on both CAN lines, check the correct bus resistance is present, put a CAN analyser onto the network (anyone who works in the automotive field and works on CAN will have CANalyzer or CANoe from Vector) and see if the relevant CAN messages are present (you will already know what messages you are expecting from the different nodes), if there is nothing on the bus, remove one node and see if the other is responding, and then vice versa. If both nodes are present on the CAN bus and transmitting messages, then you've set up the IDs incorrectly within the units, and they're looking for the messages on the wrong IDs.
So from your thread post you've said the four wires were there, which means all that had to happen is the above diagnostic steps to find the fault, which as I've said before, is a 15 minute task, not hours, for someone who has automotive experience!
Sounds like you have a grudge/chip/axe to grind for some reason. So therfore I'm out
No axe to grind here. I have nothing against TDF and wish them every success, but I am not going to join the group of TDF fan boys on Cliosport who get excited any time something "motorsport" is shown to them. There seems to be a misconception that because something is "motorsport" this instantly makes it better than something designed for a road car. The reality is that designing parts for OEM automotive use is much, much harder than designing for motorsport use, which is something people don't appreciate.
It also seems that a lot of people on here are more than happy to bash K-Tec and other companies, but should someone come on with a different view of TDF, then they just get criticised!
And back on topic; to the OP, it seems as though you have quite a range of ECUs to choose from!