I didn't think it's available in all gears though is it? That goes hint at the compromised nature of FWD, although 320lb/ft is still impressive in any gear!!
But the comparions to a Clio are pointless, two different cars really, the only common aspects is that their FWD and hatchbacks, but one is much heavier and in a different size segment so will cope more easily with that amount of power (with LSD and bigger wheels, plus "better" suspension arangement that allows more torque to be put through whilst remaing stable etc). A 182 with 300/300 would be insanely quick IF it got traction.
Yeah TBF the torque is limited in first and second but it doesn't feel like it. It's torque limited mainly to protect the drivetrain AFAIK although obviously it's going to help with traction too
The comparison was not pointless. I suggested the drivetrain was impressive. Someone else said it wasn't. I'm saying that it has far more power and double the torque of the Clio yet has far more traction. From an engineering standpoint that is impressive to anyone with even an ounce of engineering knowledge.
Yes it's newer. Things have moved on. The point still stands that it's an impressive achievement. Some people thought it would never handle the power, others think it's not in the least bit astounding that it does. Same old same old when it comes to car debates
Why is this centred around
why it has awesome traction? The fact is that it does, and that's impressive engineering unless someone is just trying to have an argument for the sake of it