Cheers for the comments folks
We went for Drivability not for pub b****cks: "i have 400 bhp etc..." so I HAVE THE FASTEST CAR IN THE WORLD, we dont like that mentality ;-)
As Andy says torque was the big aim for us as it is the key requirement for most other people who are actually serious about their cars.
We have got a selection of six other wilder camshafts (proven performance) should people want to have bhp at the top end at the sacrifice of drivability at the bottom end of the rev range. NB some of these require solid lifters and other internal modifications beyond what we have.
Just for reference the 172 / 182 has about 140 ft/lb (roughly) peak, we have that torque at 3000 rpm with this kit ;-) (148 is about the standard figure)
the reason we dont want to go wild with these figures is that this is an initial map on a brand new engine, we got great results and are over the moon, but need to run the car on the road to find out if there are any alterations that we need to make to the map to improve it further. Not being cagey, just trying to keep an element of sensibility with it all, rather than everyone saying oh its bullsh*t figures - we set it up on an engine dyno that is used by cosworth to set up all of their maps, that has tolerances built into it to the nines, so we know that the dyno is VERY accurate - to the point where gravitational pull is factored in???
GDI have everything back into the car to be running tomorrow. Only problem is getting a zorst to run to the ring as a temporary solution as our exhaust guys dont work on saturday. Andy, Stuart and Phil has done a sterling job so thank you for all of your hard work.
/y0z