Played GTA 3 earlier and just had a blast on San Andreas. It seems there's a lot of people not really understanding what a remaster is, a lot are saying "OMGZ ITS s**t, WHY WUD ROCKSTAR BRING GAMES OUT THAT LOOK THIS BAD?". Well funny thing about remasters is they can be whatever the developer decides, if they just want to improve it visually, they will. If they want to improve it controls wise they will. It's not supposed to be a new game for christs sake.
GTA 3 looks weird in ways, some of the lighting looks fantastic but then doesn't look right because the textures are dire but I am Impressed with what they've done with it. It's still the same old game just visually better in a lot of aspects.
Vice City I've not touched yet so can't say.
San Andreas is by far the best one so far. The game is just infinity better to play, the cars aren't absolutely shocking to drive, smooth inputs are actually possible now. Im actually finding it easier to play. Visually it looks brilliant, some characters look reet odd but I don't care, they looked like polygons way back when anything is an improvement from that. The lighting is great, the paint on the cars is impressive, how some are metallic etc.
I am playing these on PS5, visuals set to Fluidity. I've not noticed any frame rate drops and I've turned lens flare on, maybe I don't notice drops because I don't care who knows.
All in all... it's a remaster and it looks exactly how I though it looked back then which was amazing at the time. I'm impressed, GTA 3 is still clunky and San Andreas is well worth playing it all the way through again. It certainly isn't money wasted because I will play it and easily get 55 hours out of it and have fun while I am.