Well said.Quote: Originally posted by Has on 20 June 2005
^^^ sadly this is very very true
i hope that some of the forum users out there who are currently in this situation and do the right thing!
save up money.... work your way up with a slower car in your name and build up NCD.
Afterall it will only benefit u in th elong run.... proove to the insurance company u dont have claims after claims....then get insured on one. Its only a few years wait.
Well ive tried to express how i see it.Quote: Originally posted by badinvincible on 20 June 2005
Well said.Quote: Originally posted by Has on 20 June 2005
^^^ sadly this is very very true
i hope that some of the forum users out there who are currently in this situation and do the right thing!
save up money.... work your way up with a slower car in your name and build up NCD.
Afterall it will only benefit u in th elong run.... proove to the insurance company u dont have claims after claims....then get insured on one. Its only a few years wait.
19y/o + 172 = High probability of a smash!Quote: Originally posted by ricclio on 20 June 2005
yeah just read your post , very helpful didnt know all that but i no the way i will be doing it is fine like said before cis adviser has been through it all beofre there queto was just to high , true peter but surely how it has been for the last 2 years is still ok , not trying to argue about the point just want to know where i stand , my dad has been ring around about queotes all day and the way they have all explained it to us is that it will be fine to have me added as the additional driver ?
That is the best line i like to hear from someone in your situation.Quote: Originally posted by ricclio on 20 June 2005
i have already owned my own car so i dont need to get finance on a car it just now sold it as want something faster i may have to consider something else then ,well i can afford to pay the insurence just dont think it is worth paying 3300 a year , i think i may be looking at a smaller engine car for now and start building my claims up cheers all for your help
Good lad.Quote: Originally posted by hydeyho on 21 June 2005
Why dont you do it the opposite way around, have you as the main driver and your dad as a named driver? I put my parents as named drivers (not fraudulant as they do drive my car all the time) and it halved my insurance quote. Ive got a 1.2 with various body mods, exhaust, etc and my insurance is just $700 with full legal expenses cover and guarenteed coutesy car.
But even if you do have a car on finance I think you are still considered as the registered keeper arent you? Dont think you have to have paid the full amount for the car before you are considered the registered keeper.Quote: Originally posted by Evoo on 21 June 2005
Quote: Originally posted by Dan on 20 June 2005
The car must also be registered to the person who is the policy holder!
I guess people who lease or have them on finance deals are screwed then
You dont need to be the registered keeper, depends on the insurer.
How else could you insure a leased car which you will never own during the term of the lease? Or a car on finance where you dont own it until the end of the agreement?
Quote: Originally posted by jimmyriddle on 26 June 2005
how in the flying f**k are the insurance gunna prove that he is the main driver?? get a f**kin grip! i insure my car as the main driver and my girlfriend uses it every day to get to work!
They can prove it believe me, infact they dont have to prove it just void your insurance on the suspect of!!
People should get there own insurance for there own car! Like said before if you cant afford to insure it you cant afford it!! Im 23 and because ive always had my own policy i can insure a 172 and a FRS sensible price!! You gotta pay it some time! You cant live off your mummys all your lives!!!