And because it's thinner, it feels even nicer in your pants.
Robbos said:In my completely un-knowing, and probably wrong opinion:
I think this could just be a "test body", a very bland case which is big enough to hold all of the hardware necessary for the new model, but has not yet been styled, allowing the phone to be fully tested as a working iPhone, but having not being the final model yet.
Either that, or two people will be get fired, the one that leaked it, and the head of the visual design department...
Is it possible at all on any level that apple meant to 'lose' this phone?
Only reason i can think of why they would do this is to get a wider opinion on the phone? Or is that a stupid idea?
just seems a bit strange that an iphone would be lost and conveniently fall into the hands of someone who would plaster it all over the internet?
This has all been beautifully setup/planted by Apple. Someone hold me to it
"But there's a much bigger problem for Apple now - there's never been a leak like this before. If it's real, then next time Jobs takes to the stage, he can only reveal some final specs, and there won't be the hype we've seen in previous years.
"And if it's not real, well, that's an even bigger headache for Apple, as this phone seems to have all the features we've been after for years: a better camera with flash, larger battery and front facing camera for video calling.
"It's a no-win situation for Apple - so it's going to be fascinating to see how it reacts."
Whatever it looks like im having one Had my 3G nearly 2yrs now so cant wait.
Cover your eyes and get the polo neck over your face until the conferenceI still don't think it's real.
Not sure why. Maybe I just don't want to ruin the surprise.
I'll swap you for some PS4's i got from MOFO! LOL!I've already got one under my bed.
Cover your eyes and get the polo neck over your face until the conference
I still don't think it's real.
Not sure why. Maybe I just don't want to ruin the surprise.
What makes you think its not?
Several compelling reasons why it has to be.
Article naming the guy? Link please.
I didn't believe it was as certain as it is until I read the whole Gizmondo article rather than just skimmed, its actually quite a full, detailed read.
It's growing on me, I just hope it gets a bit prettier.
As do i, in a way i think Gizmondo have gone too far.
The article naming the guy that lost it was stupid.