Is FF 172's suspension very different from a standard Clio's mechanically?

[shiyan]

I can get a set of KW V2s for a standard Clio 2 for a very tempting price, but I've noticed on KW's website that they list the kit for the standard Clio 2 separately from that of the 172/182.

So I'm wondering - are the suspension arms or mounting points different? Or is it just different spring rates for the 2 kits?

 

[tyranical]

You do realise, that by using FF and 172 in the same sentence your going to get s**t on by a load of CS'ers with nothing better to do than say "172 FF no exist omgz0r am fed up of sayin that nub nub lololol owned etc."

 

[edgeydt50]

from what i understand they are different enough that they wont fit
FF FTW

 

[Da]

Damper rate will be wrong,
Spring rate will be wrong,
and there's a good chance the hub bolt holes will be wrong too.

Physically they are the same type/place of fitment though.

 

[bmh.01]

Hub bolt will be different spacing, 172 will be 54mm non rs will be either 52 or 58mm. Plus what da says ala ratings.

 

[shiyan]

Damper rate will be wrong,
Spring rate will be wrong,
and there's a good chance the hub bolt holes will be wrong too.

Physically they are the same type/place of fitment though.

That sucks

Thanks for the response though

 

[shiyan]

Hub bolt will be different spacing, 172 will be 54mm non rs will be either 52 or 58mm. Plus what da says ala ratings.

won't fit then I guess?

 

[shiyan]

You do realise, that by using FF and 172 in the same sentence your going to get s**t on by a load of CS'ers with nothing better to do than say "172 FF no exist omgz0r am fed up of sayin that nub nub lololol owned etc."

haha

from what i understand they are different enough that they wont fit
FF FTW

 

[Craig]

im afraid not