Magnex 2x3.5 on a Cup - pics

[BikeMan]

Hi folks,

Does anyone have any pics of the Magnex 2x3.5" exhaust on a Cup? Im thinking of getting one but would like to see what it looks like in the flesh. Ive got pics of the 6x4 on a Cup and Ive seen the 2x3.5" on Telfod Mikes red 172, but itd be nice to see it on a Cup.

Can anyone help please?

 

[Lee]

Is this one on Waynes?

http://www.cliosport.net/gallery/clio172/1003-5.jpg

 

[rt172]

Isnt Waynes a K-Tec item?

 

[telford_mike]

Thats a k-tec twin 3" - almost the same though.

 

[Lee]

Quote: Originally posted by Rhys on 22 August 2003

Isnt Waynes a K-Tec item?

Doh, silly me. I should know that as he has the sticker on the front. Still, cant look too different.

 

[rt172]

Waynes and Mikes twin pipes both look rather good. Not sure that I want a visible exhaust pipe, but if i do ever do it, itll be a 3" twin.

 

[BikeMan]

Superb - cheers for that!

Looks the dogs in my opinion

 

[Dan 172 Sport]

Is it possible to have a non visible exhaust? Sometimes I think it makes it seem unequal, unsemetrical with an exhaust showing.

As long as the sound and performance is there, I wouldnt/dont worry about the site of an exhaust, would prefer see the car semetical from the rear...

Only an opinion.

 

[Dan 172 Sport]

Other than that ^

Get one fitted anyway (Magnex, KTR), renault ones wont last and cost too much to replace!!

 

[Smith172]

Mongoose also do a twin 3.5" its the same sound as the magnex because it basically is a magnex that has been built up at a place called Collins Performance Engineering in Congleton, there would be no advantage to the mongoose over the magnex other than youd be a bit different from the rest of the crowd i.e. K-tec, magnex, etc. I have the stupidly large magnex oval on my 172 and my dad has the mongoose twin both sound the same, both seem to go the same, but mine is a lot easier to clean getting inbetween the twin pipes is like getting in a nuns .........