itg panel filter and cold weather = 28.5mpg.
S sneeks Citroen DS3 DSport Feb 5, 2006 #42 I'm hoping to achieve around 350 miles in my 172 when I collect it. My current car manages 300 at most and my previous Saxo VTS ranged from 350 - 420 miles per tank (others I knew struggled to get 200)
I'm hoping to achieve around 350 miles in my 172 when I collect it. My current car manages 300 at most and my previous Saxo VTS ranged from 350 - 420 miles per tank (others I knew struggled to get 200)
M msa197 Audi A3 TDI 170 B.E. Feb 5, 2006 #43 my old 172 I could get 350 miles to the tank that's with K-tec exhaust and BMC carbon filter. And my 182 i'm getting 380 miles to the tank with magnex exhaust and itg pannel filter.
my old 172 I could get 350 miles to the tank that's with K-tec exhaust and BMC carbon filter. And my 182 i'm getting 380 miles to the tank with magnex exhaust and itg pannel filter.
jockclio9 RX7, 172, mini & van Feb 5, 2006 #44 280 if lucky and drive 180 miles to work half of it on the Mway but that with K&N and cat back..
bradfincham Megane Trophy Feb 6, 2006 #45 my mk 172, had it about 4 weeks now ive had it read 45 mpg on motorway journeys and i do probably 350-400 miles to a tank, i let the light come on before i fill up, im happy with it
my mk 172, had it about 4 weeks now ive had it read 45 mpg on motorway journeys and i do probably 350-400 miles to a tank, i let the light come on before i fill up, im happy with it
F Frasers Cup BMW 330d :) Feb 6, 2006 #46 omar said: Mk1's are much better on fuel... so are MK2 172's. 182's are just a lost thirstier! (ps, my panel filter doesn't help?). Click to expand... Its cos they weigh much more!
omar said: Mk1's are much better on fuel... so are MK2 172's. 182's are just a lost thirstier! (ps, my panel filter doesn't help?). Click to expand... Its cos they weigh much more!