get yourself some koni's pal, I really don't see the advantage of coilovers unless you are going to put it 'in da weeds'. I managed to fair pritty well at snetterton with a few clios on coilovers, they never got away, and that was with H&R's.
Konis will be coilovers i think youll find.
Konis will be coilovers i think youll find.
New dampers and eibach.
Coilovers give too much bump steer for normal fast road driving. Fine on a track, rubbish on a road.
Shhhhhhh, I think you will find they are not.
Technically you're right, but nowadays when most people say coilovers they mean height adjustable kits.
Well i cant be helped for others ignorance.
The konis are a coil over, i was correct. I think it would save a lot of confusion if people made it clear they meant adjustable coilovers versus non adjustable coilovers.
There are far too many topics in here were the question doesnt even make sense because of this confusion.
For my 182, I went:
Brad, regarding your reply above this (unless someone else posts!) I see your point, but surely those differences will not be seem all too often? I mean the standard dampers, just on the subject of clio's, are not exactly reliable, I fail to see how an adjustable aftermarket coilover system () will be any less reliable, if at all??
That depends how you drive it. How long would cheap suspension last doing this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zz9kEkPIl80&feature=channel_page
Finally, someone see's the light. The AST's don't work, far too stiff for a light car.even the adjustable AST's were simply no good on my local back roads.
Koni's would be a better option IMO. The adjustable damping allows you to play with the handling balance, and firm things up for any track work.So no conlcusion come of this?
I'm still thinking 4 new OEM dampers and Eibachs is the way to go, over a "cheap" coilover kit?