a burnt one
No, i seen you're point but you have missed mine, it's all very well saying to give yourself more space, but as i said before, when you try that they only accelerate more to lessen that space. Or at least they do in my experience.
If i have to react to something suddenly the proedure will be the same as hard braking when he's behind me too close, he will hit me, wether thats because i brake for a genuine reason or not.
Provided he is following me at a safe distance he will have time to react if i brake hard.
That, of course is provided his brakes are capable, if not then he should keep even more distance.
Maybe if in the original posters situation, the woman had done the same this incident may not have occured but as my point proves, do nothing and they will continue to tailgaite, widen they gap and they will lessen it, brake and let them know you are there an they will either hang back or overtake and shout expletives whils giving the finger.
I know im in the minority and i know in some peoples eyes im in the wrong, i dont need others to point that out for me, i alo know plenty who do the same (even on cs, who have strangely went quiet) i also know the law is in my favour, because if he hits me under my braking, in the laws eyes he was travelling at an unsafe distance and therefore was at fault.
He will have a hard job proving i hit the brakes for no reason as he couldnt possibly see in front of me but as i have said before, i do not brake with the intention of leyting him hit me, obviously the force of my braking depends on how close he/she is.
I know nobody so far agrees and im not trying to change anyones opinion, i can see evryone elses point but i'l stick to my tried and tested methods for now.
**If anyone's opinion has changed and they wish to try the gary method i urge you not to try it whilst in front of white-van-man, they dont give a f**k and will happily plough through you wether or not they could have stopped in time**
If i have to react to something suddenly the proedure will be the same as hard braking when he's behind me too close, he will hit me, wether thats because i brake for a genuine reason or not.
Provided he is following me at a safe distance he will have time to react if i brake hard.
That, of course is provided his brakes are capable, if not then he should keep even more distance.
Maybe if in the original posters situation, the woman had done the same this incident may not have occured but as my point proves, do nothing and they will continue to tailgaite, widen they gap and they will lessen it, brake and let them know you are there an they will either hang back or overtake and shout expletives whils giving the finger.
I know im in the minority and i know in some peoples eyes im in the wrong, i dont need others to point that out for me, i alo know plenty who do the same (even on cs, who have strangely went quiet) i also know the law is in my favour, because if he hits me under my braking, in the laws eyes he was travelling at an unsafe distance and therefore was at fault.
He will have a hard job proving i hit the brakes for no reason as he couldnt possibly see in front of me but as i have said before, i do not brake with the intention of leyting him hit me, obviously the force of my braking depends on how close he/she is.
I know nobody so far agrees and im not trying to change anyones opinion, i can see evryone elses point but i'l stick to my tried and tested methods for now.
**If anyone's opinion has changed and they wish to try the gary method i urge you not to try it whilst in front of white-van-man, they dont give a f**k and will happily plough through you wether or not they could have stopped in time**