Ok cool, if you shooting a slightly longer exposure isn't their a risk of lowing highlights etc?
I have the Canon 50 mm f/1.8 MKII and it hunts SO bad sometimes. With that said, it's my favourite lens.I'm planning to buy a fix lens. What do you think which one is the better for average photography usage (portrait, family pics, cars etc.) on an APS-C body?
Canon 50 mm f/1.4 USM (good optical quality but expensive)
Canon 50 mm f/1.8 MKII (very cheap, poor build quality but outstanding optical quality, having issues with AF at open apertures)
Canon 50 mm f/2.5 macro (cheap, poor build quality but good optical performance)
Comments are welcome!
I had the canon 50mm f1.4 and wasn't that impressed with the quality between f1.4 and 2.2. My focus motor also started playing up, which is apparently a common problem too. I'd go with the sigma.
If you want to use it as a walkabout lens, then the Sigma 30mm f1.4 is also worth looking at. I loved it on my old 40D.
Not like you to switch camera systems Ukaskew...
Good choice though, I handled one in Jessops the other week and I was impressed with it.
What is the issue with the lens by the way?
If you don’t already have a CPL filter I’d highly recommend one for Automotive stuff.
Cuts out reflections on glass/bodywork.
I swear that Niall is on commission at the CPL store.
That homepage took forever to load (on a 100mb connection) and almost crashed Safari.
Was that just me?
s**t your 15. I need to start practicing!!
Quick question:
My friend wants a photo like this with him playing his instruments. Is this done with just one remote flashgun?
View attachment 103083