I have a Sigma 70-300 and that has a macro function between 200-300mm, it lets you focus on objects which are closer than it can usually focus, still has to be 95cm away though.
£108 seems too cheap?
I was asked to do a wedding a short while back. F that, way too much responsibility for me.
f**k up a shoot with a car, no biggy. f**k up someone's once in a lifetime moment... No ta.
I'm not in weddings, have shot two both for mates, hated it.
But I'm now full time pro with music photography. Learnt a lot of the basics from this forum!
I've shot a few weddings, no plans of making that my sole income though. Some go well, some expect way more than you offer.
I've got one to do next war for a friend, don't think I'll do anymore after that tbh.
I've recently got back into mountain biking and have been taking the camera with me. Need to get the hang of flash again as I rarely use it.
I'm also planning on rubbing a couple of Astro workshops over the summer for my local camera club.
It's still a hobby and 90% of the money I've brought in is from selling old prints that were used in competitions. That has all been donated to the local hospitals special care baby unit.
I'm considering going for the LRPS this year but I'll have to have a good think on a subject to shoot. Not sure Astro photography is going to be a strong enough subject as they rarely do well in salons.
Yeah definitely is more niche than a lot of areas. Very much relies on building clients over time and opportunities arising to build your career and of course earnings.Nice man, music is a hard one to get in to and make money from. You shooting for agencies/magazines etc ? I learnt so much from here, it's good to see some people are still posting and learning from it.
Cheers Dan.
The 50 is a cracking lens but you'll find yourself really restricted, especially in woods.
It's pretty tricky tbh, all mine recently have been shot using my 25-105 f4 but that's on a full frame 6d.
You want something that will go fairly wide but with a bit of zoom. Maybe something like the 17-40/50 or 24-70. All depends on your budget tbh.
If you know it's going to be close / wide then maybe the Sigma 10-20mm or even the full manual Samyang 14mm.
Something like this probably.Yeah. A full frame camera would be advantageous.
I'm purely doing it just for fun and capturing some nice moments, so absolute quality isn't essential as I won't be publishing or competing etc.
I'd say almost all shots would be trail side, close to the action at trail centers and dh tracks.
My thoughts were to get a pancake lens. Nice and wide.
At the minute I'm just window shopping, had a bunch of insurances come out!
While I know you definitely get what you pay for with lenses, a lower end lens would be fine for myself. I'd probably look to buy 2nd hand. Any good places to look or just ebay? Any other lenses worth keeping an eye out for, other than the sigma or samyang you mentioned?
Cheers
I've noticed this recently, wonder if they've changed something?Anyone else noticed the quality of Flickr photos drops when posting them ? Or am i missing something !!
Yeah it's typically the compression that does it, Flickr used to be really good quality wise, something like Facebook compresses images massively so you always get shite quality on there. Looks like they might have changed how much they compress maybe?Looks like it. Unless your viewing the pictures directly the quality drops when you change the size. Frustrating.
Yes I've watched both seasons, really like it, the judges can be w*****s sometimes. But it's nice to see that even the experts take some pretty shocking pictures before they get one that works.Has anyone been watching Sky Arts Master of photography?
I missed the first series but have watched all of series 2.
Some really good photographers on there and some challenging missions.
Worth a watch if you can find it.
I've used these for the past 3 years for both clients and for photography competitions.Where do people get their prints done? Both for personal use and for clients?! Cheers
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes I've watched both seasons, really like it, the judges can be w*****s sometimes. But it's nice to see that even the experts take some pretty shocking pictures before they get one that works.
Also cool to see nearly every one of them each week, using the Leica Q I've got, such an amazing camera.
No, was very different between seasons, I think just the male arrogant judge is the same. Last season had a presenter too, but they got rid of that this season.I've used these for the past 3 years for both clients and for photography competitions.
http://dscolourlabs.co.uk/
Very well priced, delivery is within a few days and they come flat packed (or at least the sizes i order do (A3))
Has it been the same judges both seasons?
I wonder what selection they have of cameras? I thought they were all using the Q but I thought that was down to sponsorship.
There should be a sticky to this question (there might be, I'm not sure)
1. How much money do you want /are willing to spend.
2. When it eventually comes to the "Nikon or Canon" question, because every single time it'll come to that, the correct answer is to go to a local shop and have a try of both brands' models that are in budget.
3. Is it just going to be for just taking shots your dog's or are you going to use it for other things.
4. Do you want a DSLR or a decent compact? Might make Q2 redundant if you choose compact.