MK2 PH2 172 Cup
Can anyone confirm or denie whether the rs2 is being remade as a site has popped up for them...http://www.rs2intake.co.uk/
interesting...seems like everybody is doing it now....that's like three seperate initiatives now?
Thats the bare kit though.£695?? Its a lot cheaper than it used to be?
Are you now somehow in connection with the RS2?This one was first produced around 4 years ago, so is the 'original' if you like..
Are you now somehow in connection with the RS2?
From what i can see its going to be:Thats the bare kit though.
For reference, I paid about £1500 for
Kit
Airfilter
Colour choice
Coil pack mount
Uprated engine mounts
Fitted
Mapped
I know....I have one!This one was first produced around 4 years ago, so is the 'original' if you like..
What numbers you gettingI know....I have one!
my printout is in my buildthred somewhere, with a milltek and I got 169 atw, and a pancake flat torque curveWhat numbers you getting
Looking back through the old RS2 thread, a decent RR showing before and after. Believe it was a Mike Woodfood and/or "that other mapping bloke that got banned" map too...
the plenum is about a cm from the slam panel, so basically to keep it from hitting it.Maybe a stupid question, but why were there some uprated engine mounts in the package? It has nothing to do with the inlet manifold I guess?
Lots of people probably already have uprated engine mounts (or new OEM ones).
Okay, but if you have good engine mounts, there is no problem at all? Or do you need upgrated/stiffer ones?
Correct.Okay, but if you have good engine mounts, there is no problem at all?
They require pretty darn high rpm to crack 200bhp iirc.@Gerben just remebered something......it might be worth reading through all the old post on the RS2, as there was some discussion about them not always working as well as hoped with hotter cams, and you have Shricks right?
They did seem to work well with the specially timed 197/200 cams (it this timing still a secret?) going past 200bhp at the cost of a little torque lower down.
Did one ever actually get damaged?Correct.
People fitted the RS2 manifold with 10 year old worn out engine mounts, and then complained when the manifold moved around with the engine and got damaged.
People seemed to think that you need uprated/stiffer ones, when really you just needed new OEM ones.
TBH ignoring the RS2, half the threads on here are always "I fitted uprated engine mounts and they're amazing"... without realising that it's silly to compare brand new stiffer mounts with worn out OEMs.
just looked at some old posts.....7.5K ...so might be wise to put some ARP bolts in....:tonguewink:They require pretty darn high rpm to crack 200bhp iirc.
My ph1 made 192.1 bhp and 160 lbs ft with 421's, standard airbox with a itg filter and that was on RS Tuning rollers.This just popped up on facebook:
171.8 bhp and that was on tour de force rollers after I bought the car about 4 year's ago now.What did it make in std form?
interesting...retimed to what?According to "that banned mapper" on FB:
"Best cams for the RS2 are standard ones retimed IMHO.
Makes more power from 2K-7K than the 197 ones do. The 197 ones hit a higher peak figure, but they are only better for the last 500rpm and with such a wide ratio gearbox thats just not a good trade off IMHO"