Tigger Car "Navy" N17 TWO Nov 30, 2012 #1 I see the Sigma 17-35mm f2.8-4 is a great lens for a full frame What's the difference between the Aspherical version of this lens and the EX DG? Guessing one suits full frame and the other doesn't, or something completely different? :S
I see the Sigma 17-35mm f2.8-4 is a great lens for a full frame What's the difference between the Aspherical version of this lens and the EX DG? Guessing one suits full frame and the other doesn't, or something completely different? :S
A Andy. Car Cupra Nov 30, 2012 #2 EX is to show that it's a better quality lens. You get a lens case, hood etc As standard. More info: http://www.sigma-imaging-uk.com/support/faq_lens.htm
EX is to show that it's a better quality lens. You get a lens case, hood etc As standard. More info: http://www.sigma-imaging-uk.com/support/faq_lens.htm
Tigger Car "Navy" N17 TWO Dec 1, 2012 #3 Great cheers. One on the way for the D3 Have a lend of the Aspherical version at the moment - but the other will fit my Lee adapter ring
Great cheers. One on the way for the D3 Have a lend of the Aspherical version at the moment - but the other will fit my Lee adapter ring
S .Simon ClioSport Club Member Car Audi Dec 2, 2012 #4 I have the 17-35L, its a good lens however can be very soft when at 17mm. I've had to get mine replaced twice because of this issue - I guess it's just a standard problem as all 3 units had the same problem!
I have the 17-35L, its a good lens however can be very soft when at 17mm. I've had to get mine replaced twice because of this issue - I guess it's just a standard problem as all 3 units had the same problem!
Tigger Car "Navy" N17 TWO Dec 2, 2012 #5 Hope that's a Canon issue, seeing as I'm rocking a Sigma lens on a Nikon