Stefan.
ClioSport Club Member
The X does nothing for me! Shame as no doubt good cars
an Evo X is my next car!
Be 24 with 6 years NCB and no points..
Heres to a good price!
Running costs?
The 9 was my favourite ye, felt more nimble and raw but the running costs were pretty stupid, i was getting 17mpg on average and that was mostly driving like a granny. The X was more refined but felt alot heavier, mpg was around 27 for that so was really good. I just didnt get on with the sst gearbox very well
The X does nothing for me! Shame as no doubt good cars
Evos are cheap to run as long as you get a good one with stage 1 mods done already. I prefer the 6 speeders which also get good mpg on long runs if the car has been mapped.
pocket money to run compared to my recently sold RS6.
as for the X, only model evo I have never owned, that should say it all.
I'd expect a lambo in a suit to cost a bomb to run though. What's an evo like compared to a normal sporty car I.e. Clio, meg, astra, focus etc etc
and the last bit says to me you owned every evo then decided to go rs6 when the x was released tbh
If your comparing against a newer clip cup, megane, focus rs etc than no different. You just need to make sure you shop around for best part prices and get the right tuner to fit. If you get a well maintained 8MR or IX you won't get any issues.
Drove plenty of 10s, just didn't like them hence why they can't be shifted for love or money. FYI I got the RS6 this year due to needing a estate, X has been around for some time now.
thats good to know, aren't the service intervals 6 months though?
And mrs are the ones to go for, right?... And is mr on top of fq (so fq400 mr?)
im yet to drive any of them tbh, why was the x so bad?
10s feel nothing like driving a Evo. If you want the Audi feel than the 10 is the right car for you!
Evos 1-9 need servicing every 4.5k or 6 months. Servicing cost around 200-250 per service so roughly 500 a year. Cambelt service is 45k or 5 years.
i would only go for the MR models, prefer a nice MR360, cracking cars out of the box. Simple remap equals 400/400 with zero lag, cracker of a car.
Non MR models have plainer exteriors different turbos and cams so harder and more costly to return the same 400/400 as above.
Agree with everything said here apart from the 10 not feeling like an evo, i know where your coming from if you mean the sst gearbox but a manual 10 with 400/400 is ace and is a more capable car than a 9
I'd love a 7 Extreme!!
White and red.. What's not to like?Are you blind? They look like they were painted by Stevie Wonder.
White and red.. What's not to like?
Everyone will have a different opinion of course but no 400bhp X will nail or come close to a 400bhp IX GT ;-)
its almost the same as saying the Scooby is a better car than the Evo!!!! Laughable ;-)
The X isn't a true Evo, they clearly softened it.
The X isn't a true Evo, they clearly softened it.
I'm a big Evo fan although i'd never own one! Callum on here had a 6 GSR. Was a very special car...
http://www.detailingworld.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=244605
It's modern, i'd expect it to handle better. It's still not what an Evo is about, in saying that they simply wanted to revolutionise the Evo and they did.
well considering my X running 370bhp will sit with my mates 9 GT 410bhp, I will say your wrong. Too many people jump on the hate band wagon but with a few choice mods they are great cars and if u look on MLR you will be surprised with the amount of owners who have 10s now prefer them over older models.