Quote: Originally posted by VTR_MATT on 30 April 2004
Thinking of going back to the saxo after buying my mates valver and buying a vts!
Am I stupid? Which car do u lot reckon is better?
Not necessarily u could be a burberry cap wearer in which case ud love saxos
Performance wise
valver slightly faster
Handling
similer
Reliability
similer
Running costs
similer
Tuneability
similer, basically its whether u wear burberry that will affect this decision
Swift as standard? Ive never been neaten in the two races ive had with vtss so valvers are swift too!Quote: Originally posted by VTR_MATT on 30 April 2004
Yeh, gonna do that I think! I luuurrvvveee the roar of the valver with K and N, but vts is so swift as standard-its so hard to decide!
I wud prob get a newish vts too, the dash is much nicer than the valver (dated).
f**k, I dont know!
Quote: Originally posted by h3lter on 30 April 2004
i aint even readin the above!
valver!
saxos are naff!
plus its a clio forum lol
Saxos are naff? Are they, I like em and Im the 1 buying it!
I could list many things which the saxo has that the clio dont, and not so many the other way round.
The saxo is not as nice looking, I agree-but many comforts ie ABS, A/con, passenger a-bag etc which I need-the saxo has and as I drive alot these come in handy! The valver is well unreliable too!
Quote: Originally posted by VTR_MATT on 30 April 2004
Thinking of going back to the saxo after buying my mates valver and buying a vts!
Am I stupid? Which car do u lot reckon is better? Valver
Performance wise Pretty even standard
Handling Probably the VTS.....but only just!
Reliability To be honest, my brothers VTS has had a lot more little problems than my valver
Running costs Saxo has cheaper parts and easier to work on, Clio is cheaper to insure
Tuneability VTS responds a lot better to tuning, but stick a 2.0 in the Valver and youve got the quicker car.....
mk1 172 can be had for under 8kQuote: Originally posted by VTR_MATT on 30 April 2004
I dunno, I just want somethin newer!
How much can I get a decent 172 for (same shape as h3lter)?
With under 50k on da clock?
16 iircQuote: Originally posted by VTR_MATT on 30 April 2004
B4 I go what ins group is a 172?
the mk1s are actaully faster aswell specially the ones with the ally bonnetQuote: Originally posted by h3lter on 30 April 2004
naaaaa ph1 are better! non of that girly facelift poo lol
no mate, try quotes from elephant, renault insurance, HIC and CIS they generally seem to be the bestQuote: Originally posted by VTR_MATT on 30 April 2004
20 with 1 yr NCB. Will I get raped?
If i were you id get a mk1 and save a bit of $ to put towards the extra insurance difference of a VTSQuote: Originally posted by cliosportcraig on 30 April 2004
no mate, try quotes from elephant, renault insurance, HIC and CIS they generally seem to be the bestQuote: Originally posted by VTR_MATT on 30 April 2004
20 with 1 yr NCB. Will I get raped?
Was just about to type the same but thought Id better check that no one else had first! You beat me to it!Quote: Originally posted by TheJesus on 30 April 2004
well having driven both only you can answer it dood. Whichever brings the biggest smile to your face IMO. Take em both down a B-road, should help u decide.
Err, your gonna spend £8.5k on a Saxo!? If you want a fast car that handles well, I can think of a few other cars Id rather have for that money than a Saxo! PMSL!!!Quote: Originally posted by VTR_MATT on 30 April 2004
hmmm, now there is an idea. I can stretch to about 8.5k. Gonna do sum more research!
Agree with you on everything apart from the above statement.Quote: Originally posted by jimblive on 30 April 2004
same performance as the vts (some might say faster).