I need to free up some funds and my lens are all in a bit of an overlapping muddle so some need to go!
Firstly, my 50mm f1.4 is staying put - can't be without a 50!!
Next comes the choice!
18-200 VR MKII - great lens for doing a bit of everything, surprisingly sharp for a superzoom.
OR
16-85 VR & 70-300 VR combo - 16-85 is a very nice lens, best built out of them all and handling is excellent. Trouble is, I have found that when on a walkabout the extra reach of the 18-200 may have come in useful. When it comes to the 70-300, I thought the difference between 200 and 300 would be very noticiable, but it does not seem that way. No doubt it does reach further than the 18-200, but not WOW thats far kinda way!
Trouble is, there is pro's and cons of both set ups, but I really do haveto sell either the 18-200 or the two lens set up.
Its a pretty big decision to make, so hoping some CS photo people will share their views on this matter.
At the end of the day I need to decide whats best for me, but nothing wrong with gathering some CS knowledge to help me decide!
Firstly, my 50mm f1.4 is staying put - can't be without a 50!!
Next comes the choice!
18-200 VR MKII - great lens for doing a bit of everything, surprisingly sharp for a superzoom.
OR
16-85 VR & 70-300 VR combo - 16-85 is a very nice lens, best built out of them all and handling is excellent. Trouble is, I have found that when on a walkabout the extra reach of the 18-200 may have come in useful. When it comes to the 70-300, I thought the difference between 200 and 300 would be very noticiable, but it does not seem that way. No doubt it does reach further than the 18-200, but not WOW thats far kinda way!
Trouble is, there is pro's and cons of both set ups, but I really do haveto sell either the 18-200 or the two lens set up.
Its a pretty big decision to make, so hoping some CS photo people will share their views on this matter.
At the end of the day I need to decide whats best for me, but nothing wrong with gathering some CS knowledge to help me decide!