Mk4 .:R32
FLOL.
Here's me in the car:
pmsl. nice ride Ollie. Suspension must take a battering. By the way, I'm pretty sure your santa clause
FLOL.
Here's me in the car:
There is no way a standard M3 would keep up with a 300bhp clio 2wd
anyway who cares? M3 still a better car a million times over
the end.
As Ollie said.
I think that Lego(pecker)head said his 182 turbo does 0-60 in about 5 or so seconds.
You just can't get traction for high power in a FWD car. Once rolling it's playing catch up, which is going to be hard enough against an M3. As the speeds climb and traction becomes less of an issue, aero dynamics will become more. The M3 has a drag coef of 0.3. The Clio is 0.35. That's a big difference, and again, Clio gearbox is good for 140 ? Maybe a bit more with a higher limiter. M3's will go on to 170 and a bit. CSL can do 190
As Ollie said.
I think that Lego(pecker)head said his 182 turbo does 0-60 in about 5 or so seconds.
You just can't get traction for high power in a FWD car. Once rolling it's playing catch up, which is going to be hard enough against an M3. As the speeds climb and traction becomes less of an issue, aero dynamics will become more. The M3 has a drag coef of 0.3. The Clio is 0.35. That's a big difference, and again, Clio gearbox is good for 140 ? Maybe a bit more with a higher limiter. M3's will go on to 170 and a bit. CSL can do 190
Sure can
I was just about to say, if anything once rolling the M3 has an advantage in terms of limits of aerodynamics/gearbox/engine etc. A turbo clio will be quick, esp with acceleration but it would not p*ss an M3 (it hurts to say that considering I dislike M3s...:rasp.As Ollie said.
I think that Lego(pecker)head said his 182 turbo does 0-60 in about 5 or so seconds.
You just can't get traction for high power in a FWD car. Once rolling it's playing catch up, which is going to be hard enough against an M3. As the speeds climb and traction becomes less of an issue, aero dynamics will become more. The M3 has a drag coef of 0.3. The Clio is 0.35. That's a big difference, and again, Clio gearbox is good for 140 ? Maybe a bit more with a higher limiter. M3's will go on to 170 and a bit. CSL can do 190
Shut the f**k up, people saying "M3s aren't as quick as you think" have blatantly never been in one. Anything that can do 60 in sub 5 seconds STANDARD is pretty f**king quick in my book.
And about the M3 not beating you bar far in your stardard 1*2, get real. A standard 1*2 to 100 is what, 16.8? Well a normal M3 will do 100 in 11.69, so thats a fair bit of difference IMO.
Moving on to another comment about the M3 winning off the line, then the clio catching it, the next step is the clio maxing out the gearbox and then the M3 will be back for another punch.
the clio will kill it my 1.4 dynamique 16v just about stays with an m3 . THe bloke I was racing pulled over at the lights and was amazed at my car.
309 BHP 182 ?? i dont believe that
Proof ??
rolling road slip ??
the clio will kill it my 1.4 dynamique 16v just about stays with an m3 . THe bloke I was racing pulled over at the lights and was amazed at my car.
What the f**k is going on in this thread - i have not read so much bulls**t in my life
the clio will kill it my 1.4 dynamique 16v just about stays with an m3 . THe bloke I was racing pulled over at the lights and was amazed at my car.
What the f**k is going on in this thread - i have not read so much bulls**t in my life
ahh sorry - my apoligies
ahh sorry - my apoligies
Get out ma grill.couldnt be arsed reading more than the first 2 pages but crikey, load of M3 fanboys here or what... M3s are amazing machines but sorry, a far lighter hatchback with 309brake would considerably pwn an M3 doesnt matter which mark it was (once rolling of course!!).. hell, a 250bhp mk3 ibiza cupra can pull past them and they're heavier with less power than this "uber" clio..
309 BHP 182 ?? i dont believe that
Proof ??
rolling road slip ??