my 1.4's alot faster then the 1.2's, faster then the 1.6's too. will take anyone out in it or drive it
Everyone should drive large german saloons. Iirc thats what cool people drive...
Yes. Only ones that kick out black smoke are cool thoughEveryone should drive large german saloons. Iirc thats what cool people drive...
But 1.2 is not the best Clio...Clio is the best 1.2.
You claim that yours is a racing car yo
Unfair advantage imo
you sir are a c**k
fcs09, you going?
I want a cookie for that commentYa don't say lol
:star:
this thread is abit bogus,
go to a farrari owners club, and ask about cliosport
theyll probably say theyre slow and handle like sheds, walking is better,
This is not true... FACT! everyone wants a cliosport :S
They're slightly quicker than other 1.2s (and all ph2 1.4 clios!)
0-62 in 15 secs? mine does it in under twelve rapid that
Yeah, thats the Mk2 Clio you have, the figures I posted were for the Mk3 Clio, as in 06 plate and on.
I used to have the same car as you and yeah around 12 was the time I was getting too. The 1.2 8v will only do it in 15 seconds though.
not if you know what your doing with breathability
ill smash that tbh
Guys, can I just point out here that Toms OP stated that the car was fun, and not fast??? Hes merely discovered that revving the car beyond 3500rpm generates a little more fun than he had previously discovered. Again, the 1.2 is a fine car for what it is, a small hatchback with a small engine. Its never going to challenge an RS car so why dont you all just relax
And for the record, the 1.4 is significantly faster than the 1.2. In the Mk3 Clio, the 0-62mph figure is 15 seconds while the 1.4 makes the 0-62mph sprint in a shade under 11 seconds. Yes, yes I know this isnt RS territory, thats not my point. My point is to correct a glaring error posted by another member :rasp:
this thread is abit bogus,
go to a farrari owners club, and ask about cliosport
theyll probably say theyre slow and handle like sheds, walking is better,
Glaring error? Where did i mention mk3 clio's, times or 0-60 sprints?
Two mk2 ph2 clio's, a 1.2 16v and a 1.4 16v, in the real world below motorway speeds and around town there is sod all in it. I had one, my mate had the other as young lads, nearly new.
So no, 1.4 clio's are not 'loads' faster than 1.2's, theres barely any difference!
Thinking back the 1.2 dynamique i had as my first car is probably the best car ive ever owned, loved it. Lots of fond memories. But then your first usually is...
bothered though really, your still gonna get cained by everything else:rasp:not if you know what your doing with breathability
ill smash that tbh
1.2 = Noddy car
2.0 = WRC car
3.0 = Hypercar
Yeah, thats the Mk2 Clio you have, the figures I posted were for the Mk3 Clio, as in 06 plate and on.
I used to have the same car as you and yeah around 12 was the time I was getting too. The 1.2 8v will only do it in 15 seconds though.
only quicker if you can drive. Most people on here cant drive to save their lives lol
On a clio forum yes
Real life clios arnt nothing special atall
check the avatar my friend.
1.2s are for gheys and pussies.
What exactly is this topic about?
1.2s are for gheys and pussies.
What exactly is this topic about?
Fancy a f**k?
Not everyone can afford an RS car
Thread has gone sooooo far off topic now IMO. Should be locked before it gets any more nasty.
this thread is abit bogus,
go to a farrari owners club, and ask about cliosport
theyll probably say theyre slow and handle like sheds, walking is better,
it depends entirely what your used to driving tbh,
so on a cliosport forum, its never gna go down well lol
p.s i like my 1.2, its my first car and i made sure i didnt crash it