Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Firstly only reason i bothered going to this was because dunkingnick mentioned it to me. Main reason was to go up there and let him try my siggy 300! Was really good to meet you dude and looks like you had a wicked morning with the shots from the van etc...
anyway
b******s had locked the gate...
Sigmas quality control is a heck of alot better than it was, most of the cheap crappy lenses will allways be naff its why the mass maret love them though for the ££££. Their EX range is getting stronger and stronger all the time.
Not all canons non L range are dogs either, but when people bang...
The 300 is an older model, the 120-300 is meant to be a smidge sharper, but side by side shooting with one when we did a quick test there was no real difference even when massively pixel pinching.
Honestly dont bin off the 300 idea if you need 2.8 on a budget. Buy second hand locally and test...
seriously if you dont need IS.
The sigma 300 2.8 is a steal, can pick them up second hand for under 1k, a second hand 300 2.8 IS L is still over 3k second hand :rolleyes:
Out of all of the sigmas and L glass ive used Id say sigma are producing some very good glass. Ok so my 10-20 wont come near my 16-35 L but then my 300 prime is sharper and focuses better than my 70-200. Then theres the sigma 120-300 that is a very good and very popular piece of glass, id take...
The 100-400s a bit of a dog, which is why many people have been moaning that its needed an upgrade for years, now canon have finally brought out a replacement for the old 70-200 2.8 IS L they 100-400 many feel needs to be next on the list.
The 24-105 isnt great either if you talk to alot of...
good lens.
I need to throw one into my bag for this summers festivals. *hurry up new tax year*
28-135 was shonky, i have one it stays in the cupboard lol
crikey cutting it close then, not long to go till the D-Day, its 2-3weeks away iirc.
Are FC trying to run alot more features from events rather than the usual location based stuff these days? sorry for being igonorant but I just dont read mags these days, and last I heard was when Ben chandler...
sorry for not sitting on here 24/7 to see which mag you work for ;)
Anyway as per my interesting comment, it would be interesting if its for a new project purely for trackdays as track and race cars is now defunkt, along with others.
Is the trackday photography you are trying to sort for...
Interesting if a mag is purely trackday based, most magazine features are of the cars involving alot of static shooting aswell as some moving and depending ont he quality/brand of the mag some require certain things like the ability to use lighting etc..
Mega pixel pinchers are generally the staff of jessops who dont have a clue and tell you more is better.
Theres more to what makes a good camera than how many MP it has.
they are not flattering. The poses just make the model look uncomfortable and not exactly great for the figure
background lighting is uneven, and shows lines/yellowness etc
Nope not with the A heads, a new tube alone is just arond £400 from TFC :(
But as im wanting to do sports portrature more i couldnt use cheapo ninjabongo battery packs with mega slow flash duration. So it was spend a load of dosh now and be covered for everything i wanted, or spend cheap and...
im shooting with elinchrom ranger RX powerpacks.
I didnt just shoot that pic btw but it was one that was different from the norm.
Sadly we didnt get the weather we had hoped for.... :(
and shot without the lights in shot....
Ah the article on ministry vs the property developer. I didnt know they were going on BBC tbh, I just sent them over to the office team as they said they were for a couple of press releases.
cheers, james (Jungle jim) has helped on a couple of things recently with a couple of PPing issues ive...
i usually have the lights out of shot, the owner wanted them in so i shot with them in the frame. I was quite happy with the result as for me its something a bit different.
I like what james has done aswell though
Cheers, Ive not processed the raw file yet this was just the Jpeg which was shot onto my backup card.
I tend to not really do loads of photoshopping removing stuff like that though at the moment.
Vheap triggers are good fun but dont expect 100% reliablilty, I went up to skyports when i upgraded to serious lighting over some cheap ebay ones. You still get the odd miss fire but nothing compaired to the cheapos.
Just use them for fun and dont stress to much