Search results

Tis true........but the driver helped ;)....then broke it.

you leave my dad alone!

SEABASS!

so so so gross.

yea....we get to use them....i know you dont like dipping them into your northern lass' up there ;). FRP is fibreglass you twonk!

I've fitted and ITG to the jenvey FRP base before.

lol

no.

wouldnt be worth the hassle.

I hoik the bumper off too.......makes life easier, no scratching and its only 5 bolts. Its not a tough job, so long as you have small hands and spent the time trying out every stupid tool arrangement you can think of. 'regular' tools wont cut it.

RS inlets provide the least appreciative gains. The worst results, provided by an upset customer, were 1bhp peak gains. However his midrange increased 6bhp and 6lb.ft pre remap. Saying this, 6bhp is still hard to notice.......its only the power of a good lawnmower.

Dont tell me you went with Johnathan Woods!!!!!!

Dont worry, I'm working on it. I'm the 27th generating Rushworth and can be found on rushworth.com's tree.....are you on there?

M6 x 30-35mm

Just for info's sake. I am NOT doing them for £170, infact we are not offering this to the public yet as we are still setting them up on the CNC, and its taking a while to get the program 100% sorted as its incredibly complex and there is a LOT of machining to do. If I were to do these...

Should only take you a few mins.

lol......oh well.

just get someone to hold a vacuum next to it whilst your doing it.

Dont file the sensors! lol If your careful you could modify the box opening with a grinder and a vacuum.....imo its the better choice.

Very early Ph1's have a return system to the tank which requires the use of a regulator on the rail. Later on they swapped to a non return system but used the same fuel rail blank, hence the regulator housing is still moulded on with the rail....however it is redundant. Its pretty easy to...

Your a Rushworth? fantastic. I'll get the family tree out, discount deminishes with each generation back. You can get free kudos points for having the same name though.

Cheapest and easiest way is to graph out the lift/CA data. You'll need a set of V blocks and a DTI and a degree wheel on the front of the cam. Recording lift every cam deg will = 2 crank deg.

Aircon and PAS lines and a larger aux bracket setup mean you cant really have the lines going towards the offside of the car, and the braided lines supplied arent very long.

Yes, capable, obviously wont do that on a stock engine. Battery is a user choice really as you could fit a filter in the bay, but obvious detrimental effects are to be had. Its really just a solution to the main problem that a stock type install has. Is there room for improvement, sure, of...

TBH, i'd junk the braided lines......they are a pain compared to rubber hose with push on fittings. I'd mount the pressure and temp senders in the oil lines either before or after the cooler dependant what you want to read (i'd do before then you know at least the true reading will be...

Space restriction is THE massive consideration. In terms of bulk flow improvements you should hopefully see a nil poi or slightly positive gain in midrange as the decrease in runner length is offset with bulk flow and flow quality improvements. In terms of performance, the initial designs...

Sorry, I should of been clearer. That pic is crowded and there is less space in a 172.

If you dont slacken the pulleys your also assuming the centre to centre distance between each cam stays a constant, which is unlikely with a new belt and tension value. So not only is the LCA changing, but so is the LSA.

Lol, that pic is crowded! lol.

all shite tbh.