Search results

i gaurantee that 100% VE is not achieved at any point on the new engine, especially not at such a low RPM. Sure resonant tuning will help, but with a fixed inlet length its going to be in one area, but its not going to help being low rpm VE anywhere near 100% simply due to the fact the velocity...

maybe the same person wrote that line of txt that wrote about the effectiveness of the diffuser.

trust me, even at those speeds you will not generate any positive pressure. And an engine will never run out of air. I once read an article that demonstrated at about 160mph you can generate, with a perfect ram air system (which is highly complex) about 0.3psi, and to generate a single...

DO NOT take the cam cover off. The cam bearings are built into the cam cover, you will require removal of the cambelt, and the timing tools required to re-time the engine ones you have taken them off. Then the torque procedure for the cam cover must be followed. The RS has hydraulic...

its just a near impossibility to work with the a/c equipped cars as drive for the supercharger is just impossible to get off the existing aux setup. And the cup market is too small for anybody to really warrent any development intrest. That setup might look tidy, but with zero...

there is a slight different in aerodynamic design and the fact that they do nearly 200mph.

mitsubishi bite the big one.

There is zero ram effect in the OEM airbox even if modified, the nature and complexity of 'ram effect' does not permit its use on a clio.

oh dear, not this ram effect thing again. its not something anybody even needs to consider on a clio, especially a stock one.

sound like bean can novas to me. No depth.

i always felt the phs1 was better. It had a 2 better designed cats on the early ones that then got replaced with cheaper items. The cylinder head is miles better, the throttle body is slightly larger, the airbox has a larger filter area. And they always seemed fastest despite slightly longer...

you sure your not talking about the 738? The 736 is the phs2 RS. The 182 has the RS inlet manfold and a 4-2-1 ex manifold. All stages have revised engine management and mapping aswell. i've always found the MK1 RS to have the best drive, but the cylinder heads on them tend to be best on...

The only difference is the cylinder head on latter 736 varients when they swapped to the turbo casting.

hahaha, class!

we all need to start saving and uploading replay files.

1:32.505

i find the vette the easiest to just sling around without worries, no brainer. I do like Enna aswell, its awesome flatout, then braking the chicanes...good fun. Enna in a.........erm.............saleen then. Brb

i use a logitech rumble pad2, its all about how smooth you are with your fingers on the analogue controls.

IMO, the feeling is snatchy, they are inaccurate, foul the underside of the car in most cases, are expensive and dont save any shifting time at all. And overspeeding the shifts on these gearbox's just leads to accelerated wear.

1:06.694

if he knew anything he'd have a brabus CLS.

1.08:420 in the new 997gt3

check the tappet clearances then.

summer is here...............its not wet anymore. You've traded sideways antics for pure pace now..............dear oh dear.

no problems, you'll have a reply tonight.

oh right, you sent it today.

whats your email address? i'll see if i can find it.

joy.......more foglights......especially when you dont drive during in the dark much.

Takes an hour to remove and refit modified item. A remap isnt needed straight away, but it does help. You can buy on exchange yes.

No, we have batches done before hand. CNC is quick, but you still have to square the jig before you run the program, so its about 20 mins per manifold but we do 2 at a time. We have them in stock on the shelf.