Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
no, nobody runs any cam with any decent overlap values, because fbw will not support fluctuating map signals.
I explained it to you before already, the car WILL stall if running the stock idle strategy, this means piggy back systems and simple fueling/ignition remaps.
no dont, those are special fittings.
The connector just needs to be sqeezed and lifted off, then pushed back on to replace.
Cut them and you'll get it fitted again.
If renault replaced the MAP sensor then that SHOULD of solved your problems seeing the bit the aa man put tape around is the part they changed......supposedly.
depends how lazy you are to drain and unplug everything.
Might be a tight squeeze doing it like that, but works fine enough.....i prefer doing the squeeze method.
sub 2.5" is on the small size for the clio, all the smaller systems i've seen have dropped power and been restrictive.
'optimum' depends on many things, but a stock engine, just go for 2.5"
you cannot calculate torque values from the angle torque method.
180 deg is 12 o'clock to 6 o'clock.
260 is 10 deg under 12 o'clock to 9 o'clock
if your careful you can eye it, because the reason manufacturers use angle method is that it allows monekys with no clue some rate of success.
The crank ventilation system only has that single outlet and building high crankcase pressures isnt great. If there is no particular reason to change it, dont.
PLus it stinks and you'll drip oil.
If anybody closes up 44 thou quench clearance from buggered big ends, they will bloody well know about it long before anything touches the head lol.
But yes, chris is right, increased oil clearance if not supported with oil will bring the piston closer to the head.
Why didnt you do a...