Search results

sounds the dogs even with the blow now lol....the rasp is unbelievable. AWT developed head AWT cams (touch on the wild side :oops:) AWT modifed inlet manifold Pro-Speed 182 system GDI mapped SMT6 ITG Maxogen Am i missing anything else?

sniffles.....didnt get any..had to buy my own to make myself feel better

sorry.....................................................:sick:

yup, but if your not wanting to spend stupid amoutns, all of it will require replacing at some point as the walls wear through.

oh, you mean the exhaust port?

i dont know what your cousins cup is running so i wouldnt know.

i move pikcups to the lower grille, infront of the rad.

only a few bhp and some torque midrange, but id run the std airbox.....ive not seen any good filter arrangements for the valver.

yea, you go faster with it off anyway! lol

agree, pretty pointless.

yes, phs1 172s, pre 02 cups and 172s have the bigger and better exhaust ports and better head castings. All the inlets are CNC machined so near enough the same, but earlier heads are of the sport casting. Later and current ones are, what i can tell, of the turbo casting.

The 182 exhaust manifold is certainly better, and proportianlly gives slightly better gains on the older 172 engine as the head casting incorporates the bigger exhaust ports, 182 and later cups have diddy little exhaust ports.

nope, it was done in another country. and open filters on a RR can show very good gains...>IF the bonnet is open or ajar.

where are they, i cant find them? only vid for the Vbox

if he doesnt have the power whats the point of using it? Surely the guy with the weird goggles on next generation has the power, burn him and use his dust no?

threaten them with british cooking.

because ive measured a 4bhp loss with open filters. But i wasnt limiting my suggestions to just the filter but rather the total lack of work to get 200. even those running vastly more havent hit 200 quite yet.

angle of the dangle and all.

0800 therightchoice.com/power/~lightspeed/buyonegetonefree

fuel economy? the drag coefficient will be lower at aero effective speeds (70+) with it on.

wow wow wow, hold on a second, things are just getting silly now. The realistic PHYSICAL limit of the engine is abotu 320bhp, with absolutely stupid amounts spent on it at about 10,200rpm. Forced induction, id put a realistic limit on about 600-650bhp. Im sorry, but just cams and a filter...

be surprised how dirty a bay gets without it. i can also argue the aerodynamic front if you want lol.

07816518198

mint as mint is mint. everytime you come by i wonder how you keep it so clean.

1.6 vs 2ltr isnt fair. But the honda engine is better in the long rung, especially if you up it to 2ltr. Handling wise, hondas can be made to handle any way you want, been done to death for racing purposes. 1/4 miling......std trim, nothing spectacular.....modded, the fastest one i know...

weve got an image burned in my head of that graph weve seen it so often.

i wasnt driving normally!

get what you pay for though eh......and itll be pot luck....dampers only break if they are faulty (which will show itsefl up early), or if you abuse them over pot holes......in which case it could be avoided. Its a fun car, id be happy.

its not even like the 7 is near the 1 button lol